{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":60,"pdf_page":64,"physical_index":64,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"bc4599e30d6851aa04a44a969561b9ac5609230bdd3b7a07aeca70b01218f318"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"重量体与有重量体，各具有特殊的屬性，实是之各具有上列那些  \n15特殊質性者，哲学家也得研究其中所存的真理，可以提起这一例示：辯証家与詭辩派穿着与哲学家相同的服装；对于詭辯术，智慧  \n20只是貌似而已，辩証家則將一切事物囊括于他們的辯証法中，而“实是”也是他們所共有的一个論題；因而辯証法也包含了原屬于哲学的这些主題。詭辩术和辯証法談論与哲学上同类的事物，但哲学毕竟異于辯証法者由于才調不同，哲学毕竟異于詭辯术者則  \n25由学术生活的目的不同。哲学在切求真知时，辩証法專务批評；至于詭辯术佟管貌似哲学，終非哲学。\n\n又，在对成序列中，兩行之一①为“闕失”，一切对成可以簡化为“实是与非是”，和“一与众”，例如静屬一，动屬多。实是和本体为30对成所組合，这是几乎所有思想家都同意的；至少他們都會提起过各自的对成作为第一原理一有些举出奇偶②，有些举出冷热③，有些举出定限与无定限④，有些举出友与斗⑤。所有这些以及其1005a它諸对成明显地都可簡化为“一与众”(这簡化我們可以承認⑥)，其它思想家所述原理也完全可以此为科屬而为之归綜。經过这些考虑，这就明显了，研究实是之所以为实是者应屬之于一門学术。因为一切事物或卽对成或为对成所組合，而“一与众”实为一切对成5之起点。不管这些命意是否單純，它們总得归屬于一門学术。也許它們实际不止一个命意；可是即使“二”有多种命意，这多种命意必然相联于一个基本命意(諸对成的例也相似)，即使实是或元\n\nΓ 2\n\n1004b\n\n①参看卷 A986a23脚註。\n\n②毕达哥拉斯学湿。\n\n⑧巴門尼德，\n\n④柏拉图学派。\n\n⑤恩培多克勒。\n\n⑥参看亞氏“殘篇”1478b36-1479a5\n\n60","previous_page":59,"next_page":61}