{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":69,"pdf_page":73,"physical_index":73,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8e7b21402b9da959a300faa7a65d7e362d5fdcfea860ec7ab8ae3853974ff7d3"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"15就該真确；(丑)或者是正面真确处，反面必然真确，而反面真确处.正面不必然真确。在后一情况，(丑)一个反面已确定，这將是不可爭議的信条；“无是”既然可知而且不可爭議，則其反面的“正是”应更为可知了。但是，若說(子)一切凡可否定的均可予以肯定，那么  \n20是否可將“是又不是”那兩个云謂分开来，讓他作确切的答复呢(例如不說“白又不白”而說“此物为白”，再說“此物为不白”)。如果(1)說是那兩个云謂不可分开，足見我們的对方想假借“可是可不是”的“未定物”来搪塞，这些未定物当沒有一件是現实存在的；但非現实存在的事物，怎能象他一样說話或走路呢？照这論点，如上已言  \n25 及，①一切事物悉成混一，如人与神与楼船以及它們的相反都將成为同一事物。相反可同作每一主題的云謂，一事物与另一事物就无从分别；因为它們之間若有所分别，則这差異正將是某些真实而相殊的質性。(2)假如將那兩个相反云謂分开来作答，除了引致上述各样事物的混一外，也得引致这样的結論，一切事物可以是〈真〉对的，也可以是(假>錯的；而我們的对方承認自己是在錯的一  \n30边。——我們和他的質疑問难显屬徒劳；因为說了許多等于什么都沒說。他不說“是”亦不說“不是”，他老是說“是又不是”；而且他进而又否定这些，說“也无是也无不是”;因为除了这最后一語以外，别的措詞还包含着些可捉摸的“有定事物”。\n\n倘把这条理訂定：“当正面是真实时，反面应是虚假，而反面是35真实时，正面应是虚假”这样要同时肯定而又否定同一事物將成为1008b不可能。然而他們也許竟会說問題就在这里。\n\n又，有人判断一事物，或云“如是”，或云“不如是”，另有人判断一事物謂这“如是而又不如是”；是誰的判断对，誰的判断錯了呢？若說那兩可的人对，那么具有这样一类性質的現存事物他們\n\n1008z\n\nr 4\n\n①見1006b17，1007a6。\n\n69","previous_page":68,"next_page":70}