{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","id":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","uuid":"88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title":"形而上学","normalized_title":"形而上学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7100011361","isbns":["7100011361"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":383,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%BD%A2%E8%80%8C%E4%B8%8A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/88efeb70-2043-4122-a461-fbf8384bb0fc/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"K4 / 215","pdf_page":219,"physical_index":219,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1e44ce0c4a058b7725a85be257856a0358dfdabb38bf9cb04ba815ced66735d6"},"chapter":"形而上学","content":"恰如数学家之專研抽象事物(在他开始研究前，先剝脫了一切30可威覚素質，如輕重、軟硬、冷暖，以及其它可感觉的諸对成，剩下的就只是量性与延續性，有时是一向度，有时二，有时三向度的量性与延續性，以及这些事物作为計量与延續之屬性，于任何其它方35 面就不复置意；他考察其中某些事物的相关位置与它們的屬性.61b 和另一些事物的可計量与不可計量性，以及另一些事物之間的比例等；可是所有这些都安頓在同一門学术一—几何，在实是研究方面这也如此。“实是”，就“实是”而論諸屬性和所涵的諸对反.恰正是哲学这門所專研的对象。人們可以分别將事物之不屬实5是，只屬动变者归之于物学；將事物之不以“自身为是”而以“其屬性之所是为是者”归之于辯証法与詭辩术；于是，留給哲学家的仍为我們所已举示的諸事物之所以为实是。因此，一切可比照于由10某些單純而共通的事物以成其为实是者，虽其詞具有多方面的命意，这类事物可以由彼單純之通义以归入一門学术，諸对成的情况亦然(它們可以实是的基本对成与基本差異为比照)，这样在我們15开头①所提出的那个疑难可算是解决了一—我意指許多不同科屬的事物如何能归之于一門学术这問題。\n\n章四\n\n数学家虽于求取各專題的解答时运用通則，这还得讓哲学家来考查数学的諸原理。“相等者减去相等者，所余相等”这样的\n\n1061b\n\nK4\n\n①1059a20—23。参看卷Γ，章二1059a29—34所提出的疑問，这一节也附带作出了答复。\n\n215","previous_page":218,"next_page":220}