{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","title":"从“解剖政治”到“生命政治” 福柯政治哲学研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208147485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","id":"8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","uuid":"8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","title":"从“解剖政治”到“生命政治” 福柯政治哲学研究","normalized_title":"从解剖政治到生命政治福柯政治哲学研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208147485","isbns":["9787208147485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":336,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%8E%E2%80%9C%E8%A7%A3%E5%89%96%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E2%80%9D%E5%88%B0%E2%80%9C%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E2%80%9D%20%E7%A6%8F%E6%9F%AF%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0/search"},"page":{"printed_page":185,"pdf_page":194,"physical_index":194,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"09d684e6b9c02e6c9d41b93a51295bfd74528f5f245432e40dcb6431d6eb83aa"},"chapter":"第八章 治理理由的转型：从国家到自然现实","content":"虽然福柯把国家理由的一般理论视为绝对主义理论，但仍认为国家理由的治理这一绝对特殊的有其理由、合理性和理性的治理艺术，“是西方理性史、西方合理性史上的重大事件”③，堪与同时期以开普勒、伽利略和笛卡尔等人为标志的事件相提并论。这是因为它标志着另一种思考权力、王国、治理以及尘世和来世之间关系的方式的诞生。标志着作为治理艺术之基础的国家政治的诞生。福柯把国家视为治理理由的调控理念。治理理由的原则和目标都是国家。国家是某种构思、分析、决定像国王、君主、法官、官员、法律、领土、财富这样一些国家要素的本质和关系的方式，因而，国家首先是一种现实的可理解性原则。国家的完整、完善和富强还是治理理由的合理性所追求的战略目标。“我认为可理解性原则和战略性目标囊括了被确切地称为国家理由’的治理理由。”④国家支配着治理理由，国家因其自身已然存在并为了其延续而进行合理的治理。依据国家理由进行的治理，在国际关系和外交政策中设定有限目标而放弃了全球帝国梦，而在对内政策中则奉行旨在管治无限对象的无限目标，尽管有法学理由(raisonjuridique)①和神学理由试图从外部来限制国家理由。\n\n第八章治理理由的转型：从国家到自然现实\n\n① Michel Foucault, Sécurité, territoire, population, Cours au College de France, 1977—1978, Seuil/Gallimard, Paris, 2004, p.280.\n\n②Ibid., p.253.\n\n③ Ibid., p.293,\n\n④ Ibid,, p.295.\n\n185","previous_page":184,"next_page":186}