{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","title":"从“解剖政治”到“生命政治” 福柯政治哲学研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208147485","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","id":"8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","uuid":"8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","title":"从“解剖政治”到“生命政治” 福柯政治哲学研究","normalized_title":"从解剖政治到生命政治福柯政治哲学研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208147485","isbns":["9787208147485"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":336,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BB%8E%E2%80%9C%E8%A7%A3%E5%89%96%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E2%80%9D%E5%88%B0%E2%80%9C%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E2%80%9D%20%E7%A6%8F%E6%9F%AF%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/8c70ffdd-8a8c-4694-a2ec-203e499f30b0/search"},"page":{"printed_page":255,"pdf_page":264,"physical_index":264,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"34cc400c427a9585da37499d8884622fcb2ea362dc8cdb14feebbf97cb6bc71b"},"chapter":"第十二章 政治历史主义","content":"哲学不仅应该对当下进行诊断，还应实施区域批判。这是因为理论“是区域性和局部性的”，“而不是整体化的”，理论就是关于知识分子与权力作斗争的“局部体系”③。福柯实施的区域批判与对边缘知识的高度关注密切相关。20世纪60年代起，福柯批判传统史观的“起源”、“连续性”和“总体化”这三大论题，而倡导新历史观之多个开端的“并合”(cumuls)、“间断性”和“个体化”这三大论题，并乐见新历史中断裂的增加、间断的占优、通史的成形和历史方法论问题的提出。④福柯要悬置并摧毁总体的、裹得严实的和整体的话语所特有的抑制作用，而重视间断的、特殊的、区域的批判之令人惊讶的效能。福柯并不把批判具有的这种区域特征视为迟钝、素朴或幼稚的经验主义、萎靡不振的折中主义、可在任何理论事业中渗透的机会主义、有些自愿的禁欲主义。“我相信批判的这个基本上是区域性的特征实际上表明了一种自主的而非集中化的理论生产，也就是说，它无需一个共同体制的签章来确立其有效性。”⑤\n\n第十二章 政治历史主义\n\n① Michel Foucault, \"Qui êtes-vous, professeur Foucault?\", Dits et écrits, I, 1954—1969, Éditions Gallimard, Paris, 1994, p.612.\n\n② Micnel Foucault, “Le grand enfermement\", Dits et écrits, II, 1970—1975, Éditions Gallimard, Paris, 1994, p.305.\n\n③ Michel Foucauit, \"Les intellectuels et le pouvoir\". Dits et écrits, II, 1970— 1975. Éditions Gallimard, Paris, 1994, p.308.\n\n④ Michel Foucault, L'archéologie du savoir, Éditions Gallimard, 1969, Paris, pp.15—20.\n\nMichel Foucault, Il faut defender la société. Cours au College de France, 1976, Seuil/Gallimard, Paris, 1997, p.8.\n\n255","previous_page":254,"next_page":256}