{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b","title":"断裂的时间与“异质性”的存在——德勒兹《差异与重复》的文本解读","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787308056465","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b","id":"920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b","uuid":"920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b","title":"断裂的时间与“异质性”的存在——德勒兹《差异与重复》的文本解读","normalized_title":"断裂的时间与异质性的存在德勒兹差异与重复的文本解读","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787308056465","isbns":["9787308056465"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":361,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%96%AD%E8%A3%82%E7%9A%84%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E4%B8%8E%E2%80%9C%E5%BC%82%E8%B4%A8%E6%80%A7%E2%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E5%AD%98%E5%9C%A8%E2%80%94%E2%80%94%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E3%80%8A%E5%B7%AE%E5%BC%82%E4%B8%8E%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%8D%E3%80%8B%E7%9A%84%E6%96%87%E6%9C%AC%E8%A7%A3%E8%AF%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b/search"},"page":{"printed_page":248,"pdf_page":257,"physical_index":257,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"716cccf052d75d7f222c8986d4bbc6707bb36561bf1fc5845dca3ec63bbb4b63"},"chapter":"第四章","content":"在新教与基督教研究中主要的关节点就在于竞然没有人能公然地指责它们之间是一个不充分的过去与现在的重复之间的关系，发现这个问题的是克尔恺郭尔与帕格。德勒兹指出，是他们两人利用了自身拥有的习惯与记忆反对两个不同作品之间的简单的循环、差异的状态、回忆的圈套等重复现象，这些现象在新教与基督教研究中就是被假设为从重复中“提取”出来，是作为简单的“变量”被理解的。德勒兹对他们的兴趣在于，是克尔恺郭尔与帕克首先提出要把重复当作未来一样的范畴来要求；他们更坚决地拒绝远古哲学的基础，即柏拉图“回忆说”中的记忆女神。因为在克尔恺郭尔与帕格看来，基础与一个缺席的条件是一样的，就是在罪恶中缺失了而必须被基督教重新恢复的。但是他们不拒绝习惯性的在场的基础：那不是从现代世界中逃离的演员或变形的代理人，因为在现代世界中有充分的理由使他们丧失一致性、丧失他们的生活和习惯而走向分裂状态。\n\n248\n\n断裂的时间与“异质性”的存在—德勒兹《差异与重复》的文本解读\n\n参见 Gilles Deleuze: Dif ference and Repetition, 1994, by Columbia University Press, p94。\n\n参见 Gilles Deleuze: Difference and Repetition, 1994, by Columbia University Press, p94.","previous_page":247,"next_page":249}