{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","uuid":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","normalized_title":"时间劳动与社会统治马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","isbns":["9787301301517","9780521565400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":487,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E3%80%81%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%BB%9F%E6%B2%BB%EF%BC%9A%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E5%86%8D%E9%98%90%E9%87%8A","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/search"},"page":{"printed_page":159,"pdf_page":172,"physical_index":172,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"33c42f5273128cbf082a800f705112f34f75d744affc03b96b1f3d85af6df266"},"chapter":"时间、劳动与社会统治","content":"在资本—利润（或者，更好的形式是资本—利息），土地—地租，劳动一工资中，在这个表示价值和一般财富的各个组成部分同财富的各种源泉的联系的经济三位一体中，资本主义生产方式的神秘化，社会关系的物化，物质生产关系和它的历史社会规定性直接融合在一起的现象已经完成。①\n\n马克思的批判的终点由此变成对李嘉图的起点的溯源。与他的内在批判相一致，马克思对理论（如李嘉图的理论)的批判方式不再采取一种反驳的形式，相反，他将这些理论嵌入他自己的理论之中，用他自己的分析范畴赋予这些理论以合理性。换句话说，他在自己的范畴中，为斯密和李嘉图对劳动、社会与自然所做的根本假定找到了基础：他解释了这些假定的超历史特性。同时他也进一步表明，这些理论的具体论证所依据的“材料”，是一个更深刻的、历史特定的结构的具有误导性的外在表现。马克思从资本主义社会的“本质”逐渐进入其“表面”，以此证明，他的范畴性分析不仅可以解释问题，也可以解释李嘉图对问题的回答。由此，他表明了后者不足以用来把握社会整体性的本质。通过阐明作为李嘉图理论之基础的外在表现形式，马克思试图为李嘉图的政治经济学给出一个充分的批判。\n\n第四章 抽象劳动\n\n159\n\n① Capital, vol. 3, pp. 968-969.","previous_page":158,"next_page":160}