{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","uuid":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","normalized_title":"时间劳动与社会统治马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","isbns":["9787301301517","9780521565400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":487,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E3%80%81%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%BB%9F%E6%B2%BB%EF%BC%9A%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E5%86%8D%E9%98%90%E9%87%8A","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/search"},"page":{"printed_page":261,"pdf_page":274,"physical_index":274,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1d443c9eafcf00e8c23c79e772cb015329cd8b2dfa36a275e91bcca2c82016ba"},"chapter":"时间、劳动与社会统治","content":"第五章 抽象时间\n\n261\n\n① 在《宗教生活的基本形式》(trans. Joseph Ward Swain [New York,1965])中，涂尔干同样提出了一种知识理论，它试图奠定思想范畴的社会基础。在他的分析的基础上，涂尔干得以表明，一种社会知识理论有能力处理、改变以传统方式所表达的认识论问题的框架。然而，（抛开其功能主义的方面不谈，)涂尔干的理论所关注的是社会中的社会组织，而非社会中介的形式—因此，他缺乏对社会生活诸范畴的理解，这些范畴同时也是主体性和客体性的范畴。在社会语境与思想之关系的问题上，涂尔干的分析是有歧义的。它既批判了对社会生活的自然科学式理解（这种理解忽视了社会意义），同时，它自身又是超历史的、客观论的。尽管涂尔干确实指出，科学本身建立在社会之内，但他并没有将科学以客观方式看待一切现实的这一倾向，视为一种特定的意义体系。相反，他将其作为社会的进化发展的表现。\n\n依据这里所提出的马克思的路径，我们有可能把握涂尔干对社会生活的二元论阐释。在他那里，社会与个人、灵魂与身体、抽象一般和具体特殊之间的对立（在每一组对立中，只有前者那个抽象的东西被认为是社会的)，可以被视为商品形式的实体化与投射。见The Elementray Forms of theRiligous Life, pp. 21-33, 169-173, 259-260, 306-308, 467-494。","previous_page":260,"next_page":null}