{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","uuid":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","normalized_title":"时间劳动与社会统治马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","isbns":["9787301301517","9780521565400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":487,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E3%80%81%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%BB%9F%E6%B2%BB%EF%BC%9A%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E5%86%8D%E9%98%90%E9%87%8A","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/search"},"page":{"printed_page":313,"pdf_page":326,"physical_index":326,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6ca129be540cfade86c334e5540a1dc2f14c996cb06e729d7d039fa6531441f1"},"chapter":"第六章哈贝马斯对马克思的批评","content":"这一具有方向性的动态的、极权的社会关系形式是如何构建起来的？为了解答这一问题，马克思探讨了剩余价值，即M和M'在数量上的差异的来源。由于考察的对象是一个不断表现出M-C-M'这一进程的社会，因此，剩余价值的来源也必然是一个持续不断的来源。马克思反驳了那些试图将这一来源定立在流通与储藏领域的理论。基于他迄今所发展的那些范畴规定，价值的量的不断增长必然源于这样一种商品，其使用价值具有特殊的性质：它可以成为价值的源泉。随后他说明，这一商品正是劳动力，作为商品出售的劳动的能力。③(应当记住的是，马克思所说的是价值的源泉，而非物质财富的源泉。)剩余价值的产生内在地关联着一种生产方式，它以作为商品的劳动力为基础。这种方式的前提是，劳动在双重意义上是自由的：工人必须是他们的劳动能力也即他们自身的自由的所有者；\n\n第七章 朝向一种资本理论\n\n313\n\n① Capital,vol.1,p.742.在一个非常抽象的层面上，对资本的这些首要规定为现代社会生活的线性提供了社会历史基础。韦伯在讨论托尔斯泰的作品时，将其悲观地描述为：“文明人的个人生活，被放置在一种无限的过程’之中，就其内在意义而言，它永远没有尽头。………亚伯拉罕，或者过去的农民，在‘衰老与对生活的满足’中死去，因为他位于生活的有机循环之中……但文明人……则变得对生活感到疲倦’，而非对生活感到满足’。”(“Science as a Vocation,”in H. H. Gerth and C. W.Mills, eds., From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology [New York, 1958], pp. 139-140)\n\n② 对资本范畴更为充分的考察，应当探索资本形式（按上述定义)和19与20世纪西方有机主义与生物学主义思想形态的发展之间的联系。见 M. Postone,“Anti-Semitism and National Socialism,”in ARabinbach and J. Zipes, eds., Jews and Germans since the Holocaust (New York, 1986), p. 309ff。\n\n③ Capital, vol. 1, pp. 261-270.","previous_page":312,"next_page":314}