{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","uuid":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","normalized_title":"时间劳动与社会统治马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","isbns":["9787301301517","9780521565400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":487,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E3%80%81%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%BB%9F%E6%B2%BB%EF%BC%9A%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E5%86%8D%E9%98%90%E9%87%8A","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/search"},"page":{"printed_page":331,"pdf_page":344,"physical_index":344,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"709f83b9e6a991d24ab822aebde7a7a7fb7a7895ff16ec8118e468e1d2a48c20"},"chapter":"第六章哈贝马斯对马克思的批评","content":"在这一部分，即“原始积累”中，马克思分析了现实历史走向资本主义的发展过程。①尽管这些发展可以被事后赋予某种秩序条理，但是，它们的出现绝非依据马克思在第一卷的第一部分所述的那种内在的辩证逻辑（从商品形式推演到资本范畴）。由此，马克思的论述表明，这种辩证逻辑并不代表资本主义社会史前史的真实过程—事实上，这种历史逻辑在资本形式得到充分发展之前并不存在。然而，它也指出，一旦资本形式得到充分发展，这种逻辑就会存在；而且，它也可以反过来用来描述资本主义的史前史。以此，马克思的论述方式内在地提供了一种对黑格尔式的历史哲学的批判，后者将人类历史理解为一个辩证展开的过程，而马克思则在一种历史特定的历史逻辑中揭示了它的“理性内核”。在这种批判框架中，一种普遍的人类历史确实（以一种异化的形式)在历史上实现了，而非以超历史的方式存在。因此，人类历史作为一个整体，无法以一种一元的方式加以描述—不论是依据一种内在的逻辑，还是依据内在逻辑的缺席。\n\n第七章 朝向一种资本理论\n\n331\n\nCapital, vol. 1, pp. 873-940.","previous_page":330,"next_page":null}