{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","uuid":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","normalized_title":"时间劳动与社会统治马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","isbns":["9787301301517","9780521565400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":487,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E3%80%81%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%BB%9F%E6%B2%BB%EF%BC%9A%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E5%86%8D%E9%98%90%E9%87%8A","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/search"},"page":{"printed_page":52,"pdf_page":65,"physical_index":65,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ae99fbea2b5cab1abd1f05a5b9c4819e4cd9157a8130f6730e26d35f369d4d24"},"chapter":"时间、劳动与社会统治","content":"传统的阐释将价值作为一种财富分配的范畴，它忽略了马克思所说的价值与所谓“物质财富”或“现实财富”之间的对立，因此，它无法分析建构价值的劳动形式所具有的历史特殊性。如果价值是一种历史特殊的财富形式，那么，创造价值的劳动同样必然是由历史所规定的。（一种对特殊性的分析将可以认识价值形式如何构造了生产领域以及分配领域。)然而，如果价值仅仅是一个财富分配的范畴，那么，创造财富的劳动在本质上就与非资本主义形态中的劳动没有区别。两者间的差别将是外在的—仅仅涉及它们在社会中如何被协调。\n\n因此，毫无疑问，传统的方法依据外在差别来说明资本主义劳动的特殊性。举例而言，维塔利·维戈茨基（VitaliVygodski)和斯威齐一样，将价值解释为一个市场分配的范畴，他这样描述资本主义劳动的特殊性：“在生产资料私有制的条件下，所有社会劳动都不具有直接的社会性质。”②在分析维戈茨基的“社会”所指为何之前，我们需要注意到，他的描述意味着资本主义的劳动在本质上与所有社会的劳动一样；差异仅仅在于，它的社会性质不是直接地表现出来的。曼德尔表达了一个类似的观点。尽管他在私有财产在资本主义中是否具有核心性这一问题上与维戈茨基存在分歧③，但是，他同样将资本主义劳动的特殊性描述为其非直接的社会性质：“个人劳动直接被认为是社会劳动，这是社会主义社会的基本特质之一。\n\n52\n\n时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释\n\n① Ernest Mandel, The Formation of the Economic Thought of Karl Marx (New York and London, 1971), p. 98.\n\n② Vitali Solomonovich Vygodski, The Story of a Great Discovery (Berlin, 1973), p. 54.\n\n③ Mandel, The Formation of the Economic Thought, p. 98.","previous_page":51,"next_page":53}