{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","id":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","uuid":"9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title":"时间、劳动与社会统治：马克思的批判理论再阐释","normalized_title":"时间劳动与社会统治马克思的批判理论再阐释","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301301517","isbns":["9787301301517","9780521565400"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":487,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E3%80%81%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%BB%9F%E6%B2%BB%EF%BC%9A%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E5%86%8D%E9%98%90%E9%87%8A","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9387edf6-76a0-49b0-871f-f45c222f04d1/search"},"page":{"printed_page":63,"pdf_page":76,"physical_index":76,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"43c59837f0736c5a57613d5e654001f8d9eeacdec68e5f2f2f7ba80f34e956d8"},"chapter":"时间、劳动与社会统治","content":"李嘉图和马克思之间的主要区别远为根本。马克思不是简单地以更严密的方式提出了“劳动时间决定了交换价值”这一点。②马克思绝非接受并改进了李嘉图的劳动价值论，相反，他批评了李嘉图所假设的将无差别的“劳动”作为价值源泉的看法，李嘉图没有更进一步考察生产商品的劳动所具有的特殊性：\n\n李嘉图是从商品的相对价值（或交换价值)决定于“劳动量”这一论点出发的。……而这种劳动的形式作为创造交换价值或表现为交换价值的劳动的特殊规定—这种劳动的性质，李嘉图并没有研究。③\n\n李嘉图没有认识到与商品形式的社会关系相关的那种劳动形式所具有的历史特定性，相反，他把它变得超历史了：“李嘉图还把劳动的资产阶级形式看成是社会劳动的永恒的自然形式。”④正是这种超历史的决定价值的劳动概念，阻碍了对资本主义社会形态的充分分析：\n\n劳动产品的价值形式是资产阶级生产方式的最抽象的但也是最一般的形式，这就使资产阶级生产方式成为一种特殊的社会生产类型，因而同时具有历史的特征。因此，如果把资产阶级生产方式误认为是社会生产的永恒的自然形式，那就必然会忽略价值形式的特殊性，从而忽略商品形式及其进一步发展——货币形式、资本形式等的特\n\n第二章 传统马克思主义的预设前提\n\n63\n\n① Mandel, The Formation of the Economic Thought, pp. 82-83.\n\n② A Contribution to the Critique, p. 61.\n\n③ Theories of Surplus Value, part 2, p. 164.\n\n④ A Contribution to the Critique, p. 60.","previous_page":62,"next_page":64}