{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":110,"pdf_page":124,"physical_index":124,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"bf3fd4ac5f7198c740bbcccdf9fa0c56c24c32969b3f0462b841dfaed692a9b6"},"chapter":"第三章","content":"后形而上学的反讽主义\n\n揭示罗蒂和德勒兹的共同点需要在不同的哲学用语之间进行转换，即当罗蒂要求写一部关于德里达的著作时所想象的那种转换，这样的著作会在半途遇到分析哲学家，并且不会把概念看作像人一样(Rorty1998b，329-330)。他提出，像这样对概念进行调和，有助于打破国际交流的障碍，而造成这些障碍的只不过是“不同国家要求他们的哲学学生所上的截然不同的阅读课”(Rorty1998b，329)。举一个例子说明他们在截然不同的哲学词汇内部相似的发展轨迹，德勒兹和罗蒂都对统治着哲学传统的再现说展开了有力的批判。但是，虽然罗蒂在《哲学和自然之镜》中追随后期的维特根斯坦、塞勒斯和奎因而彻底摒弃了康德形式的先验主义，德勒兹却反复从先验主义角度反对统治着柏拉图之后的哲学的再现形象。在《差异与重复》中，他沿着所罗门·迈蒙开辟的后康德式道路，提出了另一种关于思想之先验条件的解释。这条后康德式道路将这些条件从可能性条件转变为现实的条件。\n\n110\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治\n\n① 吉迪恩·考尔德认为“再描述”概括了罗蒂哲学观的核心主题(Calder 2007，3 and 33)。","previous_page":109,"next_page":111}