{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":116,"pdf_page":130,"physical_index":130,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7cd2966760a9df0b0f256a91c2d90dafbd852ec229b655b41c14146a3d894a25"},"chapter":"第三章","content":"反再现说\n\n在罗蒂从《哲学和自然之镜》以后的著作中，他一直在批判应该把知识理解为“一堆再现”这种做法。德勒兹同样一直在批判应该从再现外部现实的角度来理解思想这一观点。再现式思想形象统治着自柏拉图到康德的哲学传统，《差异与重复》对之进行了批评，并概括出另一种非再现式思想观。他曾一度提出，被理解为思想理论的哲学仍处于现代主义绘画在半个世纪前所处的那个位置：“它需要一场革命，就像将艺术从具象带到抽象的那场革命一样。”(DR 354，276)就像德勒兹在《尼采与哲学》中所做的那样，他在这本书中认为，关于思想本质的哲学思考长久以来一直被一种“教条式”形象统治，它将思考与认识等同起来，并且认为知识归根结底是一种认识形式。教条式形象主要的假设之一就是这一观点，即“思想是自然地运用一种能力……有一种自然的思想能力，它具有真理天赋或喜欢真理”(DR171，131)。①像罗蒂一样，他追随海德格尔将这一观念的起源追溯到柏拉图在描述知识时使用的特定比喻那里，尤其是知识和认识之间的类比(Rorty 1979，158-159)。\n\n116\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治\n\n① 德勒兹赞同同样的“理论”观，在他1972年与福柯进行的“知识分子与权力”的讨论中，也提到过普鲁斯特将他的书说成是一副眼镜，通过这副眼镜看外面(ID290-291，208)。","previous_page":115,"next_page":117}