{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":131,"pdf_page":145,"physical_index":145,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b2565abeb4d4d91cbbe68a2db0b7e42b5bf78158491e469e7e3650301d0bc8fb"},"chapter":"第三章","content":"德勒兹关于事件的斯多葛派理解不仅表明语言和其他的表述形式，比如电子媒体，在将日常事件现实化中所起的作用；而且它还表明哲学就事件的常识性理解而言具有的批判作用。《什么是哲学?》中概括的哲学观表明与罗蒂所说的终极词汇具有的建构主义的、批判的密切关系，这些终极词汇对处于特定时期的特定社会进行描述。对罗蒂而言，反讽与常理相对，常理被理解为这些人的态度，他们将“他们及其周围的人已经习惯了的终极词汇”视为理所当然的(Rorty 1989，74)。同样，对德勒兹和瓜塔里而言，常理的态度恰恰与他们所理解的哲学相反。常理是意见的领域，在这里，它们就本身而言与特定环境中的终极词汇融为一体。在德勒兹和瓜塔里看来，当哲学不是简单地根据常理应对事件，而是创造出能让我们将当前的事件和历史过程反现实化的新概念，并提出关于事件和情况的新描述时，它是不合时宜的，是“称得上事件”的。\n\n第三章 再描述性哲学:德勒兹与罗蒂\n\n131","previous_page":130,"next_page":132}