{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":136,"pdf_page":150,"physical_index":150,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2ee84c94f839c3a26f9489b8dba1cab27603b3c9bf4fd7d6b00013bc6ae826bf"},"chapter":"第三章","content":"德勒兹和瓜塔里的观点相反：哲学具有的明确政治使命在于促进永远的概念革命。哲学的任务是创造尼采所理解的意义上的“不合时宜的”概念：“逆着[我们的]时代行动，因此影响我们的时代并且让我们为了一个未来的时代满怀希望。”(QP107，112；参见 Nietasche 1983，60)自《尼采与哲学》以来，德勒兹总是在以下两方面将自己的哲学观与尼采的哲学观联合起来：一是反对最终目的是认识存在的事物的那些人；一是青睐一种不合时宜的思想，这种思想试图为生命创造新的可能性。《什么是哲学?》中提出的哲学定义从很大程度上讲具有乌托邦意义，即它应该促进产生新的个体身份和集体身份形式，或者召唤出“个尚不存在的新地球和新民众”(QP104，108)。罗蒂提出，自法国大革命激起了知识分子的浪漫想象，让他们放弃了上帝的意志或人的本性这些问题，代之以“创造迄今为止尚不存在的社会形式”的梦想(Rorty 1989，3)以来，这种乌托邦政治在知识分子中一直是一种普遍情况，而非例外。这一分析在某种程度上正确，这让他将福柯和其他后结构主义思想家与一种失败了的革命乌托邦学说联系起来。他接着对自己的自由主义政治和有些人的乌托邦学说进行了区分，这些人渴望某种可能永远不会体现于社会制度之中的自治(Rorty 1989, 65)。\n\n136\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治","previous_page":135,"next_page":137}