{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":151,"pdf_page":165,"physical_index":165,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f328b5d315dde86caa82f2ae255a18b1a80f6379f9daa1ab05f8c2e5c43e11c0"},"chapter":"第四章历史、生成与事件","content":"(LS 122，100)。将纯粹事件理解为真实的却非现实的实体，表达于物质身体的一系列结构之中，却不能简化为任何一系列特定的此类结构，这一观念贯穿于生成和历史的区分之中，一直到德勒兹最后的著作。但是，其确切的意思并非不言自明。\n\n德勒兹在这些早期的文本中使用了一些表述，它们表明对两种不同的存在领域进行的根本区分。根据这一解读，可以根据柏拉图的理式来理解纯粹的事件，柏拉图的理式只能被模仿，但从未完全实现于任何现实的事物、事件或事态中。从字面上阐释笼罩着其特定的具现和参与者的战争事件，或许会表明这种理解纯粹事件之体外领域的方式，德勒兹在《差异与重复》中给出的关于社会、个人主义、有机体、心理结构、语言等这些纯粹事件的例子也可能表明这一点。下面这两种情况也是如此：乔·布苏克说他的伤“先于他存在”，德勒兹提出必须将这类决定个人命运的事件理解为“不是发生之事(意外事件)”而是“位于发生之事内部，被纯粹表达的内容。它向我们示意，等待着我们”(LS 175，149)。①用这些话来说，纯粹事件会是真实的但显然是超验的客体，它们只是部分地表达于它们在时空中的具现之中。现实的历史事件至多是接近纯粹事件，但从不会完全地将它具现。\n\n第四章历史、生成与事件\n\n151","previous_page":150,"next_page":152}