{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":211,"pdf_page":225,"physical_index":225,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"627c4e0e69cea6db82df467e6b3ae91e7ab47529dd191d65042bd09610408a9e"},"chapter":"第五章殖民事件","content":"由于内在于主权权力和本国法院之关系的原因，马博一案的判决并没有做出任何事情削弱最初的主权主张的法律基础。①但就殖民这一更宽泛的历史哲学事件而言，人们广泛认为它已经推翻了无主地原则，该原则支持强制施行英国主权。现在人们认为这一原则由某些具有种族偏见的假设造成，在从殖民地法院一直到枢密院的早期判决中，这些假设根深蒂固地存在着。当前澳大利亚全国关于原住民和非原住民的和解展开了讨论，马博一案是在这一背景中做出的判决，这大大提高了马博一案的历史政治重要性。该判决产生了这样的效果，即将公共讨论扩大到财产和土地的问题之外，将与以下两方面有关的基本问题包括进来：一方面是法治，一方面是发生了大量的历史不义之后对正义的要求。该判决发动了一个司法和立法过程，这些过程有效地改写了殖民在澳大利亚发生所依据的法律条款。接下来的案子包括重新考虑19世纪的畜牧契约，和重新考虑很多土著居民与他们的传统土地一直具有的关系。①虽然这些案件的结果并非总是有利于提出所有权要求的相关土著居民，但可以说它们重新协商了最初据以解决殖民之法理学问题的那些条款。\n\n第五章 殖民事件\n\n211\n\n① 参见 Asch 1999； Patton 2001。","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}