{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":268,"pdf_page":282,"physical_index":282,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"83d19cfe9d893f188c8691849c8a7d2e9c79f22d55bc7fc6d5898c7c5d8b059e"},"chapter":"第七章","content":"其次，评判过程将会永无止境，因为它总是从特定行为者或组装的角度进行的评判。从这个意义上说，并不能最终确定某个特定事件或过程的性质。康德关于行为道德性的评判也永无止境，但其原因不同。对康德而言，我们永远不能完全确定我们是出于义务而非自身利益行事。这是个认识论问题，而不是像对德勒兹和瓜塔里而言，是行为的不明确性造成的结果。对德勒兹和瓜塔里而言，谨慎是一种如此重要的政治美德，这主要是因为逃逸线是不确定的，带有潜在的危险。谨慎是必要的，因为我们永远无法提前知道逃逸线将转向哪里，或者一组特定的异质元素能否形成一个一致的、能发挥功能的多元体。在《千高原》的评判图式中，没有什么明确是好的或坏的：\n\n268\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治\n\n①亚历山大·列斐伏尔指出，无器官身体的真正敌人不仅仅是有机体，还有反思判断的原则，它将“有机体作为一个合目的的整体，并赋予那一组织内部的各部分以功能”(Lefebvre2008，150)。因此，德勒兹和瓜塔里的概念固有的规范性反对一种特定的判断，即反思目的论判断，该判断将自然及其各部分看作合目的性的：“上帝的裁断，上帝的裁断体系，恰恰是由制造有机体、制造一种被叫作有机体的器官组织的上帝实施的，因为他无法忍受无器官身体。”(MP196—197，158-159)","previous_page":267,"next_page":269}