{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":280,"pdf_page":294,"physical_index":294,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4edd9f17bb1c3258b75f0a4d5be37bfe31aa9571bebf11ff792cd5cd5a0051e9"},"chapter":"第七章","content":"《什么是哲学?》关注的是哲学内在的政治使命。然而就现在而言，这一使命与反抗资本主义的斗争联合起来，比如当他们提出哲学概念对现在进行的批判到了这种程度，以至于它们“在反抗资本主义的斗争中与此时此地的现实联系了起来”(QP96，100)时。就在这里，德勒兹的政治词汇中出现了新东西。作为对绝对解域化的表达，革命这一概念或纯粹事件必须在其特定的历史具现中被进一步确定，这些具现以某种特殊的革命形式出现。在《什么是哲学?》中，典型的革命例子不是来自列宁而是康德，尤其来自他以宪政国家的名义支持革命，因为宪政国家将人和公民的权利视作神圣不可侵犯之权利。康德在《学科的争论》中对人们对法国大革命的理想表现出的狂热进行了评论，德勒兹和瓜塔里认为这些评论表明了纯粹事件与其在法国1789年的血腥事件中的表现之间的差别。①革命这一纯粹事件或概念反而是表现在“狂热”之中，人们以这样的“狂热”在内在性平面上思考革命。这种形式是无限在此时此地的表现，是纯粹事件性的爆发，而纯粹事件性毫无理性可言(QP96，100)。\n\n280\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治\n\n①菲利普·芒格提出德勒兹从根本上反对民主这一引发争议的论点，为我们关于该问题的思考提供了重要的刺激因素(Mengue 2003)。关于对他这一论点的进一步讨论，参见第八章。","previous_page":279,"next_page":281}