{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":304,"pdf_page":318,"physical_index":318,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"dadadb60dafe1f7a8581001a7f104a3ce4c27e38754e06f3678f5696c9290802"},"chapter":"第八章德勒兹与民主","content":"芒格表明这种特定的政治理性对于民主政治的重要性，他无疑是对的。他指出可以用德勒兹的话语来描述这种政治理性，尽管德勒兹本人并没有提供任何关于政治理性的理论——作为一种独特的思想形式，不可简化为哲学、科学或艺术，这也是对的。但他用德勒兹的思想对政治理性有所忽视来证明对其进行的下面这一指控合理，即他提供的是一种美学或伦理学而不是严格意义上的政治理论(Mengue 2003，56)，这就不对了。德勒兹对微观政治进行的详细阐述对公共政治领域有所忽视，这并不足以支撑对位于其政治思想核心的反民主倾向进行更强有力的指控。至多，这可能支持下面这一说法，即微观政治没有明确包括民主制度和民主过程，因此它就丧失了实现其平等主义理想所必需的制度。这等于是说德勒兹的微观政治理论只是有关政治决策过程的部分描述。但不完整并不是反感，并且没有理由认为德勒兹的理论提出的是对民主政治理论的替代品，而非对民主政治理论的补充。\n\n304\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治","previous_page":303,"next_page":305}