{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":310,"pdf_page":324,"physical_index":324,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"57bbe1da651911a3708bccf6a6c55b7c5888ef8e8f9255fa3c69c8188dd57144"},"chapter":"第八章德勒兹与民主","content":"内在性，超验性，和权利的创造\n\n拒绝超验性是德勒兹哲学不变的主题之一。他的思想拒绝所有诉诸超验价值、历史概念或人性的形式，而代之以一种绝对的内在论。同时，它自称是尼采所说的意义上的不合时宜的哲学，以某个未来的时代和民众的名义反对现在。这提出了一个问题：如果德勒兹的政治哲学不诉诸任何一种超验性，那么它将如何获得使之能对现在进行批判的必要距离？答案依赖于对潜在性和现实性进行的区分，该区分贯穿于德勒兹和瓜塔里的政治哲学始终。在《千高原》中，他们对比了组织平面或现实性平面与内在性平面或潜在平面。在前者那里，我们看到的是现实的事物，现实的人和各种生成(生成一女性、生成一动物等等)；在后者那里，我们看到的是抽象机器，纯粹的事件和生成不可感知。在组织平面上，我们看到的是当下的解域和变化过程，还有对上述变化过程的再辖域化、捕获和阻碍过程。就这一双面本体论而言，他们提出每个过程或者事件同时既居于现实存在的历史世界之中，也居于潜在界的或纯粹事件性的非历史世界之中，后者将现实化于前者之中，但不能还原为前者(参见第四章，第158\\~159页)。这是因为内在性平面和组织平面彼此互相含有，因为内在性平面是更加深刻的现实，因此可以说德勒兹的本体论是一种内在性哲学。\n\n310\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治","previous_page":309,"next_page":311}