{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":312,"pdf_page":326,"physical_index":326,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"836d2fe8d776b07bc134c598a65f7f1f84b227bdb73e13c90f4a554312dceccd"},"chapter":"第八章德勒兹与民主","content":"用这些术语来讲，既可以将民主看作一个永远在当前进行着的内在性事件或过程，也可以将之看作已经现实化在特定历史形式中的东西。民主这一哲学概念要表达的是民主化这一纯粹事件或过程，它既具现于现实存在的民主国家之中，也被它们背叛。作为对纯粹事件的表达，这一概念的经验表现无穷无尽，这一事实确保了该概念具有的批判功能。纯粹事件或过程与其历史形式之间存在着不同，这让我们将以下两方面协调起来：一方面是对实际存在的民主国家进行批判，另一方面是德勒兹和瓜塔里以生成一民主的名义呼吁抵抗现在，而生成一民主的不能简化为现有的宪政国家形式。\n\n相比之下，芒格认为德勒兹青睐内在性而非超验性，这让他不能明确地支持民主或法治宪政国家这一观念。他用德勒兹对20世纪80年代法国再度出现的人权热进行的一系列批评来支持这一说法。比如，在与安托万·迪洛尔和克莱尔·帕内的对话中，德勒兹控诉了当代的思想和政治对运动的抵抗：\n\n312\n\n12 德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治","previous_page":311,"next_page":313}