{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":324,"pdf_page":338,"physical_index":338,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"37eb4f4b18256184e7665f18539a3b06811bc7d95acfa3f16a147822d0a2341d"},"chapter":"第八章德勒兹与民主","content":"哲学、政治和意见\n\n芒格用来支持德勒兹和瓜塔里政治哲学具有反民主性的论据还有第三个层面，这依赖于他们认为哲学和意见对立。芒格认为，民主政治是调解各种不同的意见以做出关于公共政策的集体决定。这意味着寻求共识，或者至少是大多数共同的或部分相同的意见。这必然是通过在各种不同的讨论会中交流意见进行。相形之下，德勒兹的哲学对交流意见或共识没有兴趣。芒格指出一些话来证明他的结论，即德勒兹的政治不可能是民主的，比如：“关于讨论，至少可以说它们不会推进手头的工作，因为参与者讨论的从来不是同一件事……哲学痛恨讨论。”(QP32—33，28-29)\n\n然而，该批评混淆了在德勒兹和瓜塔里对哲学、意见以及这二者与民主政治实践之关系的理解中成问题的许多问题。将民主与意见联合起来，然后将二者与被理解为创造概念的哲学对立起来，这还不够。哲学不是政治，并且当德勒兹和瓜塔里明确拒绝交流意见是创造概念的一种途径这一观点时，我们不会从中得出关于在公共领域中进行意见交流这一点的任何结论。理清这些问题需要进一步探究德勒兹和瓜塔里在民主、意见和哲学之间确立的关系。\n\n324\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治","previous_page":323,"next_page":325}