{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":330,"pdf_page":344,"physical_index":344,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6feda83dcefd07d8dbef6b85a88928d294152f6f7d3115b043574245ab1ae0a1"},"chapter":"第八章德勒兹与民主","content":"民主政治不仅需要公共理性的信念平面，而且需要人们能够据以规范意见在该平面上的自由活动的规则。这些原则来自哪里？约翰·罗尔斯给出的一个答案是说这些原则的根本基础在于相关民众经过深思熟虑的判断或根深蒂固的意见。任何致力于拒绝政治联合之超验基础的政治哲学都可以采用这个答案。因此，德勒兹也可以采用这个答案。对罗尔斯而言，必须根据社会经过深思熟虑的判断验证正义理论和良序社会的条件(Rawls 1999b，17—18；2005，8)。这些意见并不能归于公民的日常意见。它们表达在制度中，表达在社会的宪法和法律协议中。它们对如何进行公共讨论作了限制，提供了规范性框架，人们可以在该框架内解决分歧，或者至少将其控制在合理的界限之内，从而不会威胁到社会秩序。因此，这种自由主义的民主政治观意味着区分两种或两个层面的意见：如经过深思熟虑的关于正确行为方式的判断，它们体现于制度和历史文献中，和关于当前关心的事情或公共政策的日常意见。政治哲学主要关注的是前一种意见。哲学对权力发起了游击战，而德勒兹将意见包括在权力之中，这表明他心中所想的正是这种意见。\n\n330\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治","previous_page":329,"next_page":331}