{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":356,"pdf_page":370,"physical_index":370,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7986b993c5d571b4b7556f4ca23ba64bfaf549d4e98715aea8622e60f8688fdc"},"chapter":"第八章德勒兹与民主","content":"但如我上面提出的，必须将公民的日常意见与特定民众关于基本权利原则的成熟意见区分开来。罗尔斯和德勒兹都认为政治哲学应该与某个特定社会环境中的第二种意见联系起来。相对谨慎的和现实的乌托邦学说与更不切实际的和批判性的乌托邦学说之间的差别再次出现在他们各自与哲学观念的关系中。罗尔斯的政治自由主义试图对某个在历史上具有特定形式的社会中存在的成熟意见进行重构，使之有体系并前后一致。这样，它创造出一个关于公平正义的社会的概念，当社会中的成熟意见发生变化时，这一概念也会发生变化。相较而言，德勒兹关于哲学政治使命的“乌托邦”理解意味着对成熟的意见进行批判，其目的是改变它们而不是对它们进行系统重构。这就是为什么德勒兹在《谈判》简短的图记中将哲学描述为针对民意和其他当权者，比如宗教和法律，展开一场“游击战”(P7)。应该从这个角度来理解德勒兹对资本主义造成的不公平现象进行的批判。这些批判质疑关于何为可接受的现有意见，目的是扩大和加强当代社会中生活状况的平等。\n\n356\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治","previous_page":355,"next_page":357}