{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":37,"pdf_page":51,"physical_index":51,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"53b8df80a215e66024cefeb34dd1b3bf0283715406b1a3aa263bc05165d1a035"},"chapter":"第一章","content":"作为一种社会功能的“面貌”或“颜貌”。(D 25, 18)\n\n最后，关于他们将语言理解为处于内在变化中的表达和内容之流的综合，他和/或帕内写道，当一个词“呈现为一种不同的意思，或者甚至是进入一种不同的句法之中时，我们可以确定它遭遇了另一股流或者它被引入到一种不同的符号体制中……这从来不是比喻问题；没有比喻，有的只是结合”(D140，117)。\n\n他们执意拒绝比喻对这样一种看起来奇特的词汇而言具有的重要地位，我们如何理解这一点？而且，德勒兹和瓜塔里坚称他们是按字面意义而非比喻意义来写作，假如我们将此话当真，那么就其哲学概念的指涉情况而言，这意味着什么？有些批判性解读并不认真对待他们拒绝比喻这一做法，对这些解读而言，这意味着什么？我在本章中的目的，首先是研究在这一对比喻的抵制中什么是成问题的，其次是问这与他们将哲学理解为创造“多变的”概念有何关系。最后，我将提出那些只看到经验社会科学或比喻而没有看到其他内容的批评家忽视了德勒兹和瓜塔里的新哲学实践具有的一个重要方面。在这个程度上，他们的批评\n\n第一章多变的概念、比喻和指涉问题\n\n37","previous_page":36,"next_page":38}