{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":378,"pdf_page":392,"physical_index":392,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"62e6ec4d78f9d32f250c5f03b4a5a327b0a34a2854f96f798617853047060870"},"chapter":"第八章德勒兹与民主","content":"当然，因为罗尔斯从事的是下面这一相对有限的任务，即为“正义的宪政体制是可能的”提供“辩护”，因此，静态地描述那些应该贯穿于该体制的原则这一结果不会造成任何问题(Rawls2005，101)。但如我们看到的，他的著作中总是存在着一种进行批判的渴望。正义理论的目的之一就是描述“一种理想的安排，与此安排进行的比较界定了评判现实制度的标准”（Rawls 1999b，199）。他后来的著作更突出了这一乌托邦理想，将之包括在政治哲学试图完成的任务中，虽然他这样做时非常克制。政治自由主义服务于“探索切实可行的政治可能性的界限”这一“现实乌托邦”任务，问的是考虑到现实的正义状况，一个正义的、民主的社会会是什么样子，以及在相当有利的但也可能的历史条件下它会是什么样子的(Rawls 2001，4)。他认识到切实可行之事的界限不是由现实界简单给定，因为我们能够并且确实改变了现有的社会和政治制度；但关于决定那些界限的是什么，或我们如何确定它们是什么，他言之寥寥(Rawls 2001, 5)。\n\n378\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治","previous_page":377,"next_page":379}