{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":41,"pdf_page":55,"physical_index":55,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d0d1d63ec611ef954c34210a53f3186b161a2c8dbc00998be14738f0bf05a96b"},"chapter":"第一章","content":"有时，德勒兹和瓜塔里的反再现哲学实践让他们诉诸概念和物质事态之间的另一种相合性，在这里，概念的开放性和多变性类似于事物自身中的运动。这出现在有些话中，比如《千高原》曾提出对思考不断运动的世界来说，多变的概念必须是“不精确”的：\n\n为了确切地指示某物，不精确的(anexact)表达绝对是必需的。这绝不是因为它是一个必然的步骤，或者我们只有通过近似的方式才能前进：不精确绝不是一种近似，相反，它恰恰是正在形成的精确的过程。(MP31, 20)②\n\n第一章 多变的概念、比喻和指涉问题\n\n41\n\n①这种说法并不意味着反对一般的权利，而只是反对这样一种理解这些权利的方式，即重提一系列已经确定的和固定不变的人权。在ABC(Deleuze1996)与帕内的讨论中关于法理学的说明和与耐格里的讨论(“Control andBecoming”inDeleuze1995，169—176)中，德勒兹表明他更喜欢这样一种权利观，即权利根据特定情况的需要不断地发生改变(参见下面第八章第306\\~310页关于这些评论的讨论)。\n\n②中文译文出自吉尔·德勒兹和菲利克斯·瓜塔里：《资本主义与精神分裂(卷2)：千高原》，姜宇辉译，上海书店出版社2010年版，第27页。——译者注","previous_page":40,"next_page":null}