{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":58,"pdf_page":72,"physical_index":72,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8e36e2ab6f898b3be9f874223ea9cbccec6c9859aef2e23ee7adc83d531bc71b"},"chapter":"第一章","content":"多变的概念2:战争机器\n\n在高原12“1227年：论游牧学—战争机器”中概括的“战争机器”这一概念提供了一个特别鲜明的表明运动中的概念的例子。德勒兹和瓜塔里没有列举战争机器的明确特征。相反，他们通过一系列公理和命题概括了许多明确的特征，在这里没有理由认为这一系列公理和命题是最终确定的或封闭的。然后他们用下面这些经验材料证明这些公理，这些材料来自关于神话学、文学、人类学、历史认识论和哲学思想形象史的研究。第一个公理称战争机器外在于国家。他们说战争机器是“外在”的，意思是它在所有方面，属于不同于国家机器的“另一种类、另一性质、另一起源”(MP436，352)。换言之，这些组装与国家机器完全不同，因此不可能对它们进行直接比较。德勒兹和瓜塔里一开始就表明了他们的阐述方式想要解决的问题：\n\n战争机器外在于国家机器，这一点处处皆明显，但仍然很难思考。说战争机器外在于国家机器，这是不够的。需要将战争机器本身作为一种纯粹的外在性形式来思考，而国家机器构成的是这样的内在性形式，我们习惯以它为模式，或者是我们习惯根据它进行思考。(MP438，354)\n\n58\n\n德勒兹概念：哲学、殖民与政治","previous_page":57,"next_page":59}