{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","id":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","uuid":"938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title":"[人文科学译丛]德勒兹概念  哲学,殖民与政治","normalized_title":"人文科学译丛德勒兹概念哲学殖民与政治","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564922757","isbns":["9787564922757"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":413,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%20%20%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%2C%E6%AE%96%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%8E%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/938ffece-6e9d-4ccb-a834-1221ead96536/search"},"page":{"printed_page":61,"pdf_page":75,"physical_index":75,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"77795dcb2b2b145598ad8444362dbaac947e0becce4223dd499618011e187362"},"chapter":"第一章","content":"指涉性问题\n\n如上面一开始就指出的，德勒兹和瓜塔里的多变概念具有的反再现性为批评家们带来了一个问题。许多批评家往往认为他们从事的要么是一种经验的社会科学，要么是一种依赖于比喻的哲学。不管怎样，人们认为他们容易受到针对其概念之经验基础的批评。卡普兰提供了一个关于后一种解读的例子，她将德勒兹和瓜塔里的游牧者纯粹看作对被解域了的生活方式的比喻。说在德勒兹和瓜塔里的文本中发挥作用的游牧这一形象是个比喻，这等于是说它依赖于和真正游牧民族的比较。这样来理解的话，德勒兹和瓜塔里在阐明其战争机器的概念时使用的游牧民和游牧这些词语，表明对战争机器的特征与在所谓的游牧民族那里发现的界域、武器和符号的关系进行的比较。因此，他们的文本容易遭到根据下面这一点提出的批评，即他们歪曲了其中一方以进行这一比较。更一般地说，它容易遭到根据下面这一点提出的批评，即它参与了欧洲殖民话语所维持的那些错误陈述。因此，卡普兰认为：\n\n第一章多变的概念、比喻和指涉问题\n\n61","previous_page":60,"next_page":62}