{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"93d97921-01f1-48cb-976b-1fe80778bb33","title":"后工作时代：平台资本主义时代的劳动力","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532792511","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"93d97921-01f1-48cb-976b-1fe80778bb33","id":"93d97921-01f1-48cb-976b-1fe80778bb33","uuid":"93d97921-01f1-48cb-976b-1fe80778bb33","title":"后工作时代：平台资本主义时代的劳动力","normalized_title":"后工作时代平台资本主义时代的劳动力","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532792511","isbns":["9787532792511"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":145,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/93d97921-01f1-48cb-976b-1fe80778bb33","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%90%8E%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C%E6%97%B6%E4%BB%A3%EF%BC%9A%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%97%B6%E4%BB%A3%E7%9A%84%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E5%8A%9B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/93d97921-01f1-48cb-976b-1fe80778bb33/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/93d97921-01f1-48cb-976b-1fe80778bb33/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/93d97921-01f1-48cb-976b-1fe80778bb33","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/93d97921-01f1-48cb-976b-1fe80778bb33/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/93d97921-01f1-48cb-976b-1fe80778bb33/search"},"page":{"printed_page":103,"pdf_page":107,"physical_index":107,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f19065880ba620d7ba14f15c87b44a4a50e31fb3cba5cd3cbe88df41ae628c54"},"chapter":"第五章无收入者的抗争","content":"科洛弗的理论将罢工和暴乱按照历史时期分开，认为后者正在取代前者，很有启发性地表明为什么微工人很难产生对资本构成困扰的行动。难民、贫民窟的居民和失业工人基本上都是缺乏收入的过剩劳动力，他们间歇性地承担训练谷歌算法的任务，发现自己很难通过平台体现力量，只能通过被剥夺者的群体起义体现自己的力量。肯尼亚达达布难民营的微工人的收入极不稳定，在科洛弗看来，他们是2011年席卷该难民营的骚乱的主要参与者。[2]菲律宾工人在微工作中谋求生计的挣扎在圣罗克暴乱中得到体现。 [3]\n\n但科洛弗在分析无收入者的斗争时，将无收入者视为统一的力量群体，他这样做是错误的。对科洛弗来说，暴乱成为我们当下的历史主题：“暴乱四处寻找过剩人口，这些人口是其扩张的基础。”〔4]但他的这种说法具有潜在的不良影响，会让被资本视为过剩的劳动力丧失主观能动性。尽管有些人会不可避免地被卷入暴乱之中，但需要强调的是，在全球过剩人口中并不存在一个统一的主体或单一的趋势。事实上，在过去几十年里，失业者和非正规就业者有不同的派别组织起来发动运动，其影响力远远超出了当时短暂的爆发时期。有充分的理由相信，这些斗争为那些被迫在线寻找收入的人提供了未来行动的借鉴。\n\n[1] Fanon, Wretched of the Earth.\n\n[2]Two Killed as Kenyan Police Try to Quell Riot in Packed Refugee Camp', UN News, 1 July 2011.\n\n[3] Jason Gutierrez, \"Will We Die Hungry?\" A Teeming Manila Slum Chafes under Lockdown', New York Times, 17 April 2020.\n\n[4] Clover, Riot Strike Riot, p. 154. Throughout the chapter 'Surplus Rebellions', the riot repeatedly appears as the subject of history. Also see Alberto Toscano, 'Limits to Periodization', Viewpoint Magazine, 6 September 2016\n\n103","previous_page":102,"next_page":104}