{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"95b6255f-fe45-47a4-9f2d-278e1ac56d00","title":"符号政治经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305142840","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"95b6255f-fe45-47a4-9f2d-278e1ac56d00","id":"95b6255f-fe45-47a4-9f2d-278e1ac56d00","uuid":"95b6255f-fe45-47a4-9f2d-278e1ac56d00","title":"符号政治经济学批判","normalized_title":"符号政治经济学批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305142840","isbns":["9787305142840"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":353,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/95b6255f-fe45-47a4-9f2d-278e1ac56d00","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%AC%A6%E5%8F%B7%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/95b6255f-fe45-47a4-9f2d-278e1ac56d00/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/95b6255f-fe45-47a4-9f2d-278e1ac56d00/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/95b6255f-fe45-47a4-9f2d-278e1ac56d00","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/95b6255f-fe45-47a4-9f2d-278e1ac56d00/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/95b6255f-fe45-47a4-9f2d-278e1ac56d00/search"},"page":{"printed_page":39,"pdf_page":42,"physical_index":42,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"79eeedd09b969382bd15e9f09f562ca559e1505c4e858fc10f955432c8dd7d7d"},"chapter":"符号政治经济学批判","content":"符号本身被否定了，而象征性则在这种对具象意指的否定性中出场了。在这里，拉康是为鲍德里亚所用的。他才不管拉康的本意是什么呢。鲍德里亚要从拉康的符号学分析中得出自己所需要的那个无定性的象征性：\n\n它只能被想象为被符号所否定，同时却也否定了符号形式的东西，并且在其中并没有任何空间(place)。它是一个与符号相对的非空间、无价值的存在。通过符号的区分和划界，某种象征性的无定在性只有在符号的解体中，在符号和价值的消解中才能重新出现。象征性不存在于任何地方。它并不是那些被压抑的东西，如拉康的所指。因为它在将符号分裂的同时，又消解了符号分裂后的二元对立，最终它将能指与所指撕成碎片。①\n\n固然拉康说，真理总是在对它的误解中抵达，他也没有指望人们对其思想的还原式理解，可是，我觉得对拉康的误认也不能到了违反最基本意思，甚至是颠倒黑白的地步。虽然鲍德里亚也时常在自己的理论表述中故作玄秘之状，但在拉康面前，还真显得是小儿科式的卖弄。鲍德里亚只是想着自己那种前符号学的无定在的象征关系，而根本不理解拉康思想的整体逻辑结构，不知道属于拉康思想逻辑中第二个重要研究域的象征一符号学的颠覆性语境，不知道拉康的符号学讨论和批判的目的恰好是要宣布一切象征性的非法性。\n\n① 见本书正文第217页下注1。\n\n代译序 符号之谜：物质存在的化蝶幻象\n\n039","previous_page":38,"next_page":40}