{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"967ec6d9-829f-4b06-83ed-16459bf5638b","title":"时间的全球史（The Global Transformation of Time）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787308198882","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"967ec6d9-829f-4b06-83ed-16459bf5638b","id":"967ec6d9-829f-4b06-83ed-16459bf5638b","uuid":"967ec6d9-829f-4b06-83ed-16459bf5638b","title":"时间的全球史（The Global Transformation of Time）","normalized_title":"时间的全球史theglobaltransformationoftime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787308198882","isbns":["9787308198882"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":362,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/967ec6d9-829f-4b06-83ed-16459bf5638b","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E7%9A%84%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%8F%B2%EF%BC%88The%20Global%20Transformation%20of%20Time%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/967ec6d9-829f-4b06-83ed-16459bf5638b/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/967ec6d9-829f-4b06-83ed-16459bf5638b/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/967ec6d9-829f-4b06-83ed-16459bf5638b","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/967ec6d9-829f-4b06-83ed-16459bf5638b/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/967ec6d9-829f-4b06-83ed-16459bf5638b/search"},"page":{"printed_page":310,"pdf_page":319,"physical_index":319,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f367b687f8e0d7591ed6c03ad1cbfa76e176d615931acf3a88d7a6367ae2eba3"},"chapter":"第七章 给所有人的一份历法","content":"使历法得到统一，轻易就与通过国家现代化来消灭“数不胜数的凭借其与历法惯例的联系而损害了国家的文化统一与发展的神话、宗教教条、迷信和占星术”的这股动力混合在了一起。1955年，委员会发表了第一份报告，尼赫鲁亲自给委员会的发现撰写了导言式评论。这位印度领导人估计，当下正在使用的历法有30种，这种情况被他视为“我们过去的政治和文化历史的自然结果，部分表现出了国家内部以往的政治分歧”。尼赫魯声称，“既然我们已经获得了独立，那么，出于民用和社会的目的，显然值得在历法中追求某种程度上的统一性”。“\n\n★★★\n\n德国对历法改革进行的带有民族意味的再阐释，最为显著地揭示了国际主义和普遍主义的局限性。当国际联盟开始自己的调查时，德国的观察家们带着强烈的兴趣追随其后。1926年后，由于国际联盟的建议，德国国家历法委员会开始了自己调查舆论的工作。随着纳粹分子在1933年1月的成功掌权，历法改革仍然受到欢迎，然而赞助人完全不同了。\n\n时间的全球史\n\n310","previous_page":309,"next_page":311}