{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"98a6c6ef-8d0b-4a2a-9c10-0b5a4dd59268","title":"社会的构成 结构化理论纲要","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300227504","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"98a6c6ef-8d0b-4a2a-9c10-0b5a4dd59268","id":"98a6c6ef-8d0b-4a2a-9c10-0b5a4dd59268","uuid":"98a6c6ef-8d0b-4a2a-9c10-0b5a4dd59268","title":"社会的构成 结构化理论纲要","normalized_title":"社会的构成结构化理论纲要","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300227504","isbns":["9787300227504"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":461,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/98a6c6ef-8d0b-4a2a-9c10-0b5a4dd59268","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%9A%84%E6%9E%84%E6%88%90%20%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E5%8C%96%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E7%BA%B2%E8%A6%81","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/98a6c6ef-8d0b-4a2a-9c10-0b5a4dd59268/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/98a6c6ef-8d0b-4a2a-9c10-0b5a4dd59268/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/98a6c6ef-8d0b-4a2a-9c10-0b5a4dd59268","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/98a6c6ef-8d0b-4a2a-9c10-0b5a4dd59268/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/98a6c6ef-8d0b-4a2a-9c10-0b5a4dd59268/search"},"page":{"printed_page":418,"pdf_page":451,"physical_index":451,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ef5361318ecc843d210800e7cf25e2b2d373bf7c3266d87243ad4ec187b9f313"},"chapter":"第六章结构化理论、经验研究和社会批判","content":"(5) 结构化：\n\n这是吉登斯的核心观念。他的论述中有两个词与此有关：“structuration”和“structuring”。前者是吉登斯的概念（但并非他首创，比如古尔维奇[Gurvitch]就使用过)，而后者仅仅是一种用法。准确的译法是将后者译为“结构（化）形成的过程”，但在具体行文中经常难以做到这一点，因此，我们有时将后者也译为“结构化”或“结构化过程”。需要指明的一点是，“structuration”正是体现在“structuring”上面。\n\n(6) 制约与约束：\n\n“constraint”是涂尔干引入社会学的一个经典概念，但国内学界始终没有达成一致的译法。以往经常把它译作“强制”(《社会学方法的准则》就采用这种译法)或“约束”。但前者的汉语含义明显过窄，因为“constraint”并不仅限于暴力手段，而且实际上主要依靠的是非暴力的影响或诱导手段，因此，译成“强制”似乎不妥；而“约束”的译法则比较理想，但和“sanction”一词又难以区分开。故此我们决定将“constraint”译作“制约”，将“sanction”译作“约束”。比较而言，前者自涂尔干以来，一直具有结构性的色彩，而后者和法律方面的“制裁手段”或行政管理方面的“奖惩手段”有直接的关联，当代理论中仍保留了这两个词在这一方面的含义差别。【新版将“constraint”改译作“约束”，“sanction”改译作“制约”。—中译校订补注】\n\n社会的构成\n\n418","previous_page":417,"next_page":419}