{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","uuid":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","normalized_title":"技术与时间1爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","isbns":["9787544726863"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":329,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A1.%E7%88%B1%E6%AF%94%E7%B1%B3%E4%BF%AE%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%87%E5%A4%B1","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":181,"pdf_page":195,"physical_index":195,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"58ac82870c0d09ed9ec5d158054f47e08863b7608998d973674d035b8fcbc651"},"chapter":"第三章谁?什么?人的发明","content":"“制造工具的创造先于使用的机会[……]，而工具则因后来的活动而持续。信号和词之间的差别也属于同类。概念的一贯性和工具的持久性虽然性质不同，但却是十分相似的。”\n\n引起大猿猴的某些行为的“物质场合”之所以永远不可能导致语言和技术，是因为这些场合总是“具体”的，未经意思扩展的突破，而语言和技术则要求一个根本性的“抽象”，即进入一种一般性的领悟，尽管这种一般性的抽象可以是非常初级和微不足道的：一个词可以被反复使用，同一个词可以指意不同的具体场合，这个简单的事实本身就说明了任何一个词都直接来自一般化的抽象。(正如器具用途的范围一样，一切陈述的前提就是有一个“已经在此”，而且它始终在此。)那么怎样使这类分析同有关原始语言的两个阶段的假设一致呢？所谓两个阶段是\n\n第一部分 人的发明\n\n《手势和语言》，第1卷，第164页。\n\n正因为如此，所以在胡塞尔看来，“表达即是[……]经验，它的特征就在于指出本质或一般性形式，并进入有关事物的认识”。勒内·谢莱尔(René Scherer),《逻辑研究的现象学》，第127页，PUF，1967年版。\n\n181","previous_page":180,"next_page":182}