{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","uuid":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","normalized_title":"技术与时间1爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","isbns":["9787544726863"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":329,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A1.%E7%88%B1%E6%AF%94%E7%B1%B3%E4%BF%AE%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%87%E5%A4%B1","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":199,"pdf_page":213,"physical_index":213,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"60dc8fa4c162d9dcc3b76e31c3f358139f6576b684c75cc2d30a0894ad963053"},"chapter":"第三章谁?什么?人的发明","content":"引论\n\n在本书的第一章末尾，我们曾经提出了这样的问题:技术逻辑的动力作为时代和技术组织的推动因素，怎样同超前的—人类逻辑的——操作动力相关联?技术性是由什么构成的?换言之，从现象学的时间性出发，如何构成技术性?在上一章结尾，问题的形式发生了转换：如何从技术性出发构成时间性？“谁”的时间性是怎样形成于“什么”的切实性之中的?我们在提出这些问题时，以后种系生成概念为基础。\n\n假如说存在着时间的原生结构，并且这个结构形成于代具(作为对终结的超前)已经在此的境域中，形成于外在化的运动中，也就是说它建立在“遗传调节的废墟”之上，并且以这个废墟为起点，那么：\n\n1、这种和后种系结构无关的时间是无从谈起的，这种结构每一次都被已经在此—即被组成人类和技术连续时代的记忆的载体—以独特的方式翻新；这里，附加的因素也就是基本的因素，这种基本的附加性就是时间(和时间的关系或相关差异)。\n\n2、这样的分析需要首先澄清超前的可能性(可能性的可能性)。这样的澄清即是生存分析的对象本身，它应当被作为代具性问题来解释。\n\n这种分析方法是不可能由从人类学向现象学的骤然一跃来实现\n\n199","previous_page":null,"next_page":200}