{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","uuid":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","normalized_title":"技术与时间1爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","isbns":["9787544726863"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":329,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A1.%E7%88%B1%E6%AF%94%E7%B1%B3%E4%BF%AE%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%87%E5%A4%B1","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":240,"pdf_page":254,"physical_index":254,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3255d1582a58f94ee52f327e1b13585c01754d2db42d8fd0172433fda733644d"},"chapter":"第二章已经在此","content":"技术与时间\n\n现在。”\n\n个体性、特有语言的独有性和不确实等范畴都是以超前为起点来思考的。这种原始的不确定性只能在事后牵动一个过去的已经在此、过去的经验，牵动一切衰弱状态遗留的被动结果。此在因此是一种“向前”存在，它来自未来这个原始的现象，“向极端的、最贴己的可能的前移就是向最贴己的过去存在'的理解回归。此在作为真实的过去存在的条件就是它的向前性。从某种意义上说，过去存在从未来中涌现”。\n\n但是，过去经验的重复具有某种切实的、具体的、历史技术的可能性，这就是进入已经在此的过去存在的可能性。问题在于，是否能够把上述原始的不确实性—个体性—建立在这种可能性之上？\n\n7. 时钟:无未来一代的实时\n\n作为过去存在的过去即根本的可能性，重复于每一个现在之中。这种过去的重复是否会沉入实际程序的纯粹技术的文码系统之中？在世存在和世界的存在就是在这个系统中编织的。在此，重复的问题同样蕴含了再生产性的问题。我们将会看到，根据本杰明和布朗桥的观点，再生产性应当被当作生产性的首要确定因素来分析，因为它直接包含了技术的问题。抑或说，它本身就是技术问题。爱比米修斯原则的神话和祭奠性根源的含义本身就是重复过失，并在事后反思。这就是由重复构成的基本条件。\n\n自从宙斯把生命隐藏起来之后，人类消失于它唯一赖以生存的实际性之中。生存的烦忙使人类不得不发明并制造一些方法以便补充自身性能的缺陷，这就为它烙下代具的印记。这种以代具为代表的“什么”\n\n《时间的概念》，第44页。着重号系作者加。\n\n《存在与时间》，第65节。\n\n240","previous_page":239,"next_page":241}