{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","uuid":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","normalized_title":"技术与时间1爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","isbns":["9787544726863"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":329,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A1.%E7%88%B1%E6%AF%94%E7%B1%B3%E4%BF%AE%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%87%E5%A4%B1","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":263,"pdf_page":277,"physical_index":277,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1176a6888ef4f79eb2043fd94840ce4309c816b5119964da077a9f72099f7ce7"},"chapter":"第三章“什么”的解脱","content":"第三章“什么”的解脱\n\n在过失性存在的状态中，此在进入它具有相关差异性的个体化，在重温《存在与时间》的第一篇中有关日常性的分析之后，我们将尝试着解释它的个体化。在过失性存在的状态中听到的声音，就是把此在引向对它过去存在的超前重复的力量。在本章中，我们将从以下几个方面进一步展开上一章的分析：\n\n1. 日常性的分析：作为从“什么”的解脱；\n\n2.过失性存在的结构：作为对“什么”的介入；\n\n3.历史性的历史构造问题以及历史性作为“什么”的新面目。\n\n1. 日常性的分析：作为从“什么”的解脱(第一篇)\n\n1.1.“谁”与“什么”的相关差异\n\n如果不是通过此在的日常性为中介而提供的预备性理解①，就无法提出存在的意思的问题。这实际就是《美诺篇》问题的再现。存在只能在事后的延迟中呈现自己：这还是爱比米修斯的问题。美诺、爱比米修斯和此在所包含的共同问题就是本质为遗忘的知识的问题。这种预备性理解的“爱比米修斯式”结果总是被包含在“通常的理解”之中，这种“明确”的理解是间接的，既传统又具有历史性，是被遗忘的“中介”。\n\n①《存在与时间》，第2节。\n\n263","previous_page":262,"next_page":264}