{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","uuid":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","normalized_title":"技术与时间1爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","isbns":["9787544726863"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":329,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A1.%E7%88%B1%E6%AF%94%E7%B1%B3%E4%BF%AE%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%87%E5%A4%B1","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":270,"pdf_page":284,"physical_index":284,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4e539b958755d3ff4de02ffdc3f91ad01f10874408279e7ab61c2f882c708516"},"chapter":"第三章“什么”的解脱","content":"1. 4. 胡塞尔的回忆概念和作为指引的“什么”的系统\n\n海德格尔关于符号(指引最典型的工具)的概念既包括信号也包括残迹和资料。由此可见：\n\n1.把符号和信号的混同，说明不懂得示意或指意的动力，也即不懂得作为过去存在的指意规则（后面谈到语言的主体问题时还会讨论这种规则)的属于特有语言的不透明性，正如不懂得一般性的“什么”的动力一样；\n\n2.资料作为一种“画面意识”的特性，就胡塞尔的意思而言，是没有自身的厚度的。在这一点上，海德格尔忠于老师的观点。\n\n胡塞尔的《时间的内在意识讲座》一书的目的在于，批判原始联想的概念，布伦塔诺正是企图从这个概念出发以认识时间性。这种由想像实现的联想产生一种对时间性时刻的“再现”，即再现具有过去特征的现在，同时这种再现又与现在结合在一起。胡塞尔对布伦塔诺的原始联想的概念的批判，所针对的是布伦塔诺在这个概念中给予想像以解释滞留现象的作用。批判的基本论据是：布伦塔诺在赋予过去时刻以想像的特征的同时，实际上使得现在、过去和将来之间的区别成为不可能，除非他断定过去和将来都是“非现实的”。与之相对立，胡塞尔则从对旋律这样一种时间物体的思考出发，认为时间现象应当作为一种变化过程来认识，在这个变化过程中，每一个现在时刻或每一个“原初映象”都牵带着对现在具有建设意义的滞留和前置。滞留属于这样一种“当即”:格拉内尔曾称之为“大当即”，胡塞尔曾喻之为“彗星尾巴”。这种属于当即的时间现象的滞留也叫做第一回忆。\n\n技术与时间\n\n⑩胡塞尔：《时间的内在意识讲座》，第6节。\n\n270","previous_page":269,"next_page":271}