{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","uuid":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","normalized_title":"技术与时间1爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","isbns":["9787544726863"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":329,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A1.%E7%88%B1%E6%AF%94%E7%B1%B3%E4%BF%AE%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%87%E5%A4%B1","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":284,"pdf_page":298,"physical_index":298,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"77d92e92bc11643b7d77bf77c1f4f4100fb663574cae197d61e4079d1b22c9f0"},"chapter":"第三章“什么”的解脱","content":"过失在它们的累积中被遗忘，彼此覆盖；然后就有过失的经验：不是指某个特定的过失，而是原本的过失性存在的过失本身—这种原始性的缺陷就是被海德格尔称为Gewissen的起源的缺陷。被呼唤、谈论和疑问的“谁”就是此在本身。但是由“谁”来呼唤、谈论和疑问？这个“谁”“处于一种惊人的不确定性之中”。“意识作为对忧的呼唤而呈现”，“意识之声提出一定的债’”或一种“过失”。如果说爱比米修斯原则必须从“谁”和“什么”的相互表示——即死亡原则——的角度来认识，那么，“呼唤”的“谁”就是先于“谁”和“什么”的区分的“谁”，是先于外在于根本性的自身之外的“什么”的“谁”，是先于起源的原始性缺陷的“谁”。\n\n“没有任何东西可以从‘世界’的意义上给呼唤者以‘谁’的确定性。它是处于陌生中的此在，是世界的虚无中赤裸的它存在’。呼唤者和日常的人们'本身没有亲邻关系—即如外来陌生的声音。人们’迷失于它所烦忙的纷乱世界’之中，对它来说，还有什么比那陌生的孤独和被抛进虚无的自身更陌生呢？”\n\n这个“谁”的虚无道出了“谁”就是、尚且是而且永远是虚无：它没有开始，也不会有终结，它被“抛”在所有切实地获得的“自身”之外，“自身”就是它的相关差异。缺乏同一性这个标志给予“谁”的结构是：它总是已经在多种分散不同的场合下构成自身，由此，自身单一实体被作为永远未来的东西体验。\n\n技术与时间\n\n《存在与时间》，第54节。\n\n同上，第57节。\n\n284","previous_page":283,"next_page":285}