{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","id":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","uuid":"9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title":"技术与时间：1.爱比米修斯的过失","normalized_title":"技术与时间1爱比米修斯的过失","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544726863","isbns":["9787544726863"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":329,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A1.%E7%88%B1%E6%AF%94%E7%B1%B3%E4%BF%AE%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E8%BF%87%E5%A4%B1","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/9b88d2f2-8eab-4576-8a52-82d9265ef4da/search"},"page":{"printed_page":66,"pdf_page":80,"physical_index":80,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2afd6e335521cc8f2e30d68650717b44dce086a89dd0682f054744d8a601c000"},"chapter":"第一章技术进化论","content":"15. 趋势的两个方面\n\n为了“突出内在外在环境’相互作用的结果的可预见性这个技术进化独特的属性”，勒鲁瓦-古兰从自己的观点出发，使用了“趋势”这个哲学范畴，通过这个范畴，他要表明“一个发自内在环境的、逐渐攫取外在环境的运动”。这种攫取运动非常近似于确定肌体在自身的环境中的形态发生的运动，它排除了任何对趋势作出先验分类的可能性。这种运动只能呈现于事件之中，趋势“只有在物质化、并因而丧失趋势之本性时才变得明晰。正因为如此，我们才将特殊的趋势和事件的第一等级等同”。这也就是说，形式不先于物质，这一点我们还将在西蒙栋的理论中遇到。所以，我们必须对构成技术进化的个体化进程分化—作新的范畴规定。但是根据西蒙栋的观点，工业技术物体无需内在环境的干预而自身具体化。这种具体化的动力通过各类功能的复合和多重限定而臻于技术逻辑的完美，并包含了一个新的环境概念：复合环境。内在环境不复存在了，因为，工业化的技术物体造成了内在环境溶于外在环境的结果，同时，这个一般性的环境也不复为外在。\n\n技术与时间\n\n《环境与技术》，第335页。\n\n同上，第336页。\n\n066","previous_page":65,"next_page":67}