{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a1e5ae7b-c522-43a1-8010-a08ee136eca8","title":"政治经济学批判：马克思《资本论》导论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305231148","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a1e5ae7b-c522-43a1-8010-a08ee136eca8","id":"a1e5ae7b-c522-43a1-8010-a08ee136eca8","uuid":"a1e5ae7b-c522-43a1-8010-a08ee136eca8","title":"政治经济学批判：马克思《资本论》导论","normalized_title":"政治经济学批判马克思资本论导论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305231148","isbns":["9787305231148"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":266,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a1e5ae7b-c522-43a1-8010-a08ee136eca8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%AD%A6%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4%EF%BC%9A%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E5%AF%BC%E8%AE%BA","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a1e5ae7b-c522-43a1-8010-a08ee136eca8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/a1e5ae7b-c522-43a1-8010-a08ee136eca8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/a1e5ae7b-c522-43a1-8010-a08ee136eca8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a1e5ae7b-c522-43a1-8010-a08ee136eca8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a1e5ae7b-c522-43a1-8010-a08ee136eca8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":64,"pdf_page":95,"physical_index":95,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4b1bf5f697828ab238c4283a0ff2758e6a6fdc7ea7e8ef557e8fa4fb7c0b7224"},"chapter":"第四章资本、剩余价值与剥削","content":"因此，无论市场与资本之间只是存在外在的、松散的关系，还是存在一种内在的、必然的联系，这都不是一个单纯的学术问题，毋宁说其回答包含着直接的政治后果。\n\n如果《资本论》第一卷前三章所刻画的商品和货币流通不是独立的、与资本无关的东西(正如马克思采用“表面上的”一词来描述简单流通），那么，这种非独立性必须在对流通的研究中被清晰地阐明。正如商品和货币之间的关系那样，必须展现货币和资本之间的内在的、必然的关联。\n\n我们把对商品和货币的研究概括为三个基本步骤：\n\n（1）首先，商品已经得到了分析。它本身表现为具有双重属性：使用价值和价值。不过，它的价值对象性被证明是一种特殊的东西：这是一种纯粹的社会特征，与单个的商品无关，而只是对于被交换的商品而言的共同的特征(因而是价值的“幽灵般的”特性)。\n\n81\n\n64\n\n政治经济学批判：马克思《资本论》导论","previous_page":63,"next_page":65}