{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","title":"人工智能和资本主义的未来","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780745338613","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","id":"a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","uuid":"a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","title":"人工智能和资本主义的未来","normalized_title":"人工智能和资本主义的未来","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780745338613","isbns":["9780745338613","9780745338606","9781786803955","9781786803979","9781786803962"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":225,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E5%92%8C%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%9A%84%E6%9C%AA%E6%9D%A5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02/search"},"page":{"printed_page":108,"pdf_page":116,"physical_index":116,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6129aa893f187256d4e07d6d12ea5ecafe68c21531a0cecca9a3b57df36d43bf"},"chapter":"Digital Barricades: Interventions in Digital Culture and Politics","content":"CONCLUSION: TOWARDS THE EVENT HORIZON\n\nSome working-class recomposition is occurring in digital capital, with the powerful presence of AI as an invisible attractor around which various rebellions and dissents array themselves. We do not want to overstate this process. Anti-corporate techlash can be politically shallow; smart city opponents are still marginal; algorithmic justice both hinders and helps capital; defections from social media are slow and partial; anti-surveillance policies could be rolled back by competitive pressure; despite the success of the Project Maven revolt, other victories against militarized AI are scant; above all, over the uptick in strikes against AI-capital hangs the shadow that resistance may spur further automation. While we have suggested that, regardless of job-loss issues, AI-capital poses many other threats to the well-being of its populations, it is also the case that the future of struggles within it depends heavily on how deeply the fourth industrial revolution undermines the basis of wage-labour.\n\nAs we have seen, early predictions of an imminent AI-caused employment implosion have been significantly watered-down by more recent studies, and have lost their edge as the post-recession US economy returned to what is officially regarded as full employment. Yet some observers suggest even limited, sectoral job loss to automation could figure as largely in upcoming US elections as the jobs-gone-abroad issue did in 2016 (F. Levy 2018). Longer term, estimates of AI employment effects continue to vary wildly, and even some Business-as-Usual theorists have changed their models to admit the possibility that capital’s job-creating and job-destroying functions might go seriously out of sync (Acemoglu and Resteropo 2018). Some maintain quite catastrophic positions; the widely read treatise on AI by Kai-Fu Lee (2018), former head of Google China, insists on a loss of up to 40 per cent of US jobs by 2030, and similar numbers for China – in other words, numbers of world-historical turbulence. Such runaway AI, massively increasing the reserve army of the unemployed, would further weaken unions and other worker organizations, but the extremity of immiseration could generate new forms of proletarian revolt (even, perhaps, as bloody and determined as those of Westworld’s androids). In such speculations, we arrive at the event-horizon foreseen by the ‘Fragment on Machines’, where capital’s own machinic drive explodes it from within: terminally decomposing its working class, capital decomposes itself. It is the apparently irrefutable logic of this futurist proposition that perhaps gives leftists a certain last-ditch confidence, complacency or even enthusiasm as they face AI-capitalism. ‘Probably’, one says, ‘the tech won’t really work – and, anyway, if it does, it only perfects the system’s self-destruction.’ But how warranted is this assurance?\n\n108\n\ninhuman power","previous_page":107,"next_page":109}