{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","title":"人工智能和资本主义的未来","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780745338613","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","id":"a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","uuid":"a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","title":"人工智能和资本主义的未来","normalized_title":"人工智能和资本主义的未来","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780745338613","isbns":["9780745338613","9780745338606","9781786803955","9781786803979","9781786803962"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":225,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%BA%E5%B7%A5%E6%99%BA%E8%83%BD%E5%92%8C%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%9A%84%E6%9C%AA%E6%9D%A5","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a2eab101-adfc-4a0d-8142-63a4d11cee02/search"},"page":{"printed_page":155,"pdf_page":163,"physical_index":163,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b84ec09eedb8ccefae155921a9647ac53e95e1586e28b6d3fad5507156092206"},"chapter":"Digital Barricades: Interventions in Digital Culture and Politics","content":"The trajectory of AI-capital will not be diverted by the reformist measures of AI plus UBI and eco-modern climate planning, on a more-or-less painless path where it automates itself out of existence by increasing its organic composition and pulling the value rug it stands on from under its own feet. While left accelerationism and its allied schools of thought attempt a break with the rendezvous of capital and machine intelligence, they only abet that process.\n\nTo find a counter-proposition, we need something else, something akin, though not identical, to what Raniero Panzieri enunciated half a century ago, close to the start of the cybernetic era, when he articulated the doctrine of ‘refusal’ that lies at the root of what is known as autonomist Marxism: autonomist precisely in seeking, not the autonomy of capital from humans, but of humans from capital:\n\n[T]he capitalist use of machinery is not, so to speak, a mere distortion of, or deviation from, some ‘objective’ development that is in itself rational, but that capital has determined technological development … that ‘the science, the gigantic natural forces, and the mass of social labour’ are embodied in the system of machinery, which, together with those three forces, constitutes the power of the ‘master’. Hence, vis-à-vis the ‘voided’ individual worker, technological development presents itself as a development of capitalism: as capital, and ‘because it is capital, the automatic mechanism is endowed, in the person of the capitalist, with consciousness and a will’. (Panzieri 2017)\n\nFollowing from this, Panzieri postulated that ‘working-class overthrow of the system is a negation of the entire organization in which capitalist development is expressed – and first and foremost of technology insofar as it is linked to productivity’ (2017). That said, it is also true that there can be no straightforward recapitulation of operaismo’s original ‘refusal’ strategy, based as it was on the strength of the mass worker in the industrial factory; we are today in a fully social, if not global, factory and in one where the cybernetic processes that Panzieri and his comrades saw coming towards them from over an obscure horizon are now part of the relentless $2 4 / 7$ light of digital capitalism. In this context, it is quite true that the borders between refusal and reappropriation, between the saboteur, the hacker and the defector, are more fluid and complex than before. If we are sceptical of accelerationism, we also think that Walter Benjamin’s famous ‘pulling of the emergency brake’ is entering the realm of sepia-toned photo-images. The issue at this point is a series of swerves and transversal manoeuvres, as the locomotive of history goes completely off its imaginary tracks. But not all diagonal moves are equal: some lose you the game. All struggles against actually-existing AI-capital are within it, but this does not mean that the moment of negation, rather than acquiescence, can be relinquished: in the twinning of refusal and reappropriation, refusal comes first, if left adoptions of AI are not to be merely accessory to capital.<sup>2</sup>\n\nconclusion: communist ai\n\n155","previous_page":154,"next_page":156}