{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a31b1606-7526-4f42-a12d-1edcb41ff0e7","title":"DIGITAL LABOR THE INTERNET AS PLAYGROUND AND FACTORY","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780415896948","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a31b1606-7526-4f42-a12d-1edcb41ff0e7","id":"a31b1606-7526-4f42-a12d-1edcb41ff0e7","uuid":"a31b1606-7526-4f42-a12d-1edcb41ff0e7","title":"DIGITAL LABOR THE INTERNET AS PLAYGROUND AND FACTORY","normalized_title":"digitallabortheinternetasplaygroundandfactory","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780415896948","isbns":["9780415896948","9780415896955","9780203145791"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":267,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a31b1606-7526-4f42-a12d-1edcb41ff0e7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/DIGITAL%20LABOR%20THE%20INTERNET%20AS%20PLAYGROUND%20AND%20FACTORY","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a31b1606-7526-4f42-a12d-1edcb41ff0e7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/a31b1606-7526-4f42-a12d-1edcb41ff0e7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/a31b1606-7526-4f42-a12d-1edcb41ff0e7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a31b1606-7526-4f42-a12d-1edcb41ff0e7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a31b1606-7526-4f42-a12d-1edcb41ff0e7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":209,"pdf_page":216,"physical_index":216,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"99fb0cf3f6ce19a7d355c3e90c82a933eab091c1d8bb7a2b3bdbf616bec932f6"},"chapter":"DIGITAL LABOR","content":"Traditional labor and its organizations have an objective interest, under conditions of declining capitalism, to adopt the idea of global and shared innovation commons and thereby ally themselves with the emergence and deepening of peer production. Under conditions of social strife, capitalist corporations can be transformed into worker-owned, self-managed entities that create their own commons of shared knowledge, code, and design.\n\nFarmers and agricultural workers have a similar interest in the creation of shared innovation commons to transform soil-depleting industrial agriculture into smart eco-agriculture based on shared innovation commons uniting farmers and agricultural knowledge workers.\n\nCommons-oriented peer production can both strengthen netarchical capital, and hence the system of capital accumulation, and the reproduction of the commons. Peer producers can benefit from corporate platforms while struggling for their own rights as the real value creators and, in conditions of social strength, could potentially take over such platforms as common or publicly owned utilities.\n\nParticipants in commoner-owned for-benefit entities cansignificantly transcend purely competitive market dynamics while avoidingauthoritarian central planning through the adoption of open-book management, adaptation to publicly available signaling, and negotiated coordination of production and distribution. This does not obviate the possible need for democratic planning through citizen participation whenever this is needed and wished for. However, it creates broad areas for mutual alignment of productive capacities.\n\nThe traditional ideologies and movements of the industrial labor movement became largely associated with collective property. Peer production opens the avenue for more distributed property, whereby individuals can freely aggregate not only their immaterial productive resources but their material productive resources. Under those conditions, possible abuse of collective property is balanced by the individual freedom of forking productive resources.\n\nPeer production is vital for sustainability and biosphere-friendly production methods, as open design communities design naturally for sustainability but also transform the production process itself—for example, to ensure participation and more distributed access to productive resources. Combined with the development of more distributed machinery as well as more distributed capital allocation, peer production can lead to a new system that combines smart material relocalization with global cooperative innovation and the existence of global phyles uniting peer production entities on a global material scale. Phyles are transnational, communitysupportive entities that create a new layer of postcapitalist material cooperation.\n\nFree labor is only problematic under conditions of precarity and nonreciprocal value capture by (netarchical) capital. Under conditions of social solidarity, the freely given participation to common value projects is a highly emancipatory activity.\n\nThesis on Digital Labor in an Emerging P2P Economy\n\n209","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}