{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a3d20d9f-08e6-48dd-8975-661ffa08f781","title":"动物与人二讲【无封面、版权页、目录页】","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a3d20d9f-08e6-48dd-8975-661ffa08f781","id":"a3d20d9f-08e6-48dd-8975-661ffa08f781","uuid":"a3d20d9f-08e6-48dd-8975-661ffa08f781","title":"动物与人二讲【无封面、版权页、目录页】","normalized_title":"动物与人二讲无封面版权页目录页","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":114,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a3d20d9f-08e6-48dd-8975-661ffa08f781","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%8A%A8%E7%89%A9%E4%B8%8E%E4%BA%BA%E4%BA%8C%E8%AE%B2%E3%80%90%E6%97%A0%E5%B0%81%E9%9D%A2%E3%80%81%E7%89%88%E6%9D%83%E9%A1%B5%E3%80%81%E7%9B%AE%E5%BD%95%E9%A1%B5%E3%80%91","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a3d20d9f-08e6-48dd-8975-661ffa08f781/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/a3d20d9f-08e6-48dd-8975-661ffa08f781/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/a3d20d9f-08e6-48dd-8975-661ffa08f781","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a3d20d9f-08e6-48dd-8975-661ffa08f781/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a3d20d9f-08e6-48dd-8975-661ffa08f781/search"},"page":{"printed_page":108,"pdf_page":107,"physical_index":107,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c6efa7f7a463157ed57223f3e5a686020acb71851f5d5fff5dfd9d68bc7304e4"},"chapter":"动物与人二讲","content":"这些相似之处仅表现出西蒙东对德勒兹所产生的一部分影响，仍有许多地方值得我们继续发现。我们暂且将它作为一个开放问题搁置起来，谈谈另一位同时深受西蒙东与德勒兹影响的当代哲学家。\n\n(2)西蒙东与斯蒂格勒\n\n我们在上文谈论“愚蠢”问题的时候已经提到了贝尔纳·斯蒂格勒，他通过个体生成（即西蒙东的个体生成体系）解读德勒兹所提出的“愚蠢”问题，并在解读的过程中表明了自己的论点：愚蠢与知识（savoir）的关系表现为知识本身的愚蠢。在这个基础，斯蒂格勒提出了“知识的药学情境”(condition pharmacologique du savoir)¹，即知识同时是解药与毒药。2007年，西蒙东的《心理与集体的个体生成》重版之际，斯蒂格勒为书作序，也在“序”中影射了知识的药学，他写道：“这种现象（指知识不断细化进而导致其本身分裂的现象）的状态会促使知识取得非凡的进步，然而也会导致思想的某种摘除，甚至导致它的去个体生成（désindividuation），这也是如今多学科聚合在一起的愿望所试图克服的。”2此处的去个体生成实际上就是斯蒂格勒曾经详细解读过的药（pharmakon）引发了知识的无产阶级化3，从而进一步导致了西蒙东所谓的“个体生成的丧失”（perte d’individuation)4。斯蒂格勒在揭示超工业时代个体生成的丧失时提及了动物问题，并以此比喻人类在数字时代的情境。这个比喻就是“蚁穴的隐喻”：\n\n108\n\n/动物与人二讲","previous_page":107,"next_page":109}