{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a8d76baf-3072-4977-bc4a-7ba36ebeb36c","title":"[马克思主义研究译丛·典藏版]大同世界","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300234083","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"a8d76baf-3072-4977-bc4a-7ba36ebeb36c","id":"a8d76baf-3072-4977-bc4a-7ba36ebeb36c","uuid":"a8d76baf-3072-4977-bc4a-7ba36ebeb36c","title":"[马克思主义研究译丛·典藏版]大同世界","normalized_title":"马克思主义研究译丛典藏版大同世界","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300234083","isbns":["9787300234083"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":323,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a8d76baf-3072-4977-bc4a-7ba36ebeb36c","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%C2%B7%E5%85%B8%E8%97%8F%E7%89%88%5D%E5%A4%A7%E5%90%8C%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/a8d76baf-3072-4977-bc4a-7ba36ebeb36c/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/a8d76baf-3072-4977-bc4a-7ba36ebeb36c/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/a8d76baf-3072-4977-bc4a-7ba36ebeb36c","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a8d76baf-3072-4977-bc4a-7ba36ebeb36c/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/a8d76baf-3072-4977-bc4a-7ba36ebeb36c/search"},"page":{"printed_page":48,"pdf_page":80,"physical_index":80,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a5b1a7ca974940ae164495144822a352fca702b22ec18de541448d93dcb66856"},"chapter":"第二章现代性 (以及另类现代性的远景)","content":"第二章现代性 (以及另类现代性的远景)\n\n我们进入太空，一切准备就绪……但是，如果我们仔细观察的话，我们的激情就会荡然无存。我们并不想征服太空，我们只想将地球的疆界延伸至宇宙的边界…我们并不需要其他世界。我们只是需要镜子。我们不知道该拿其他世界如何是好。\n\n——斯坦尼斯拉夫·莱姆：《索拉里斯星》\n\n(Stanislaw Lem, Solaris)\n\n2.1 作为反抗的反现代性\n\n印度的经验表明，殖民统治在形式上的终结，并没有终结殖民主义知识的统治。\n\n——古哈：《孟加拉的财产原则》\n\n(Ranajit Guha, A Rule ofProperty for Bengal)\n\n现代性之内的权力与反抗\n\n现代性总是一分为二的。在将现代性理解为理性、启蒙运动、与传统相决裂、世俗主义等之前，我们必须将现代性理解为一种权力关系：统治与反抗，主权与争取解放的斗争。[1]这一观点与下面的标准历史叙事背道而驰：现代性源于欧洲，与殖民地的前现代相对立不论是野蛮的、宗教的还是原始的前现代。正如米格诺罗（WalterMignolo）所说：“没有殖民统治就没有现代性，因为殖民主义就是现代性的构成要素。”[2]之所以是构成性因素，因为它揭示了现代性核心的等级关系。因此，现代性不是单纯地出现在欧洲或是殖民地，而是贯穿在两者的权力关系中。[3]也因此，反现代性的力量，如对殖民统治的反抗，并非外在于现代性，而是完全内在于现代性之中，内在于权力关系之中。\n\n65\n\n67\n\n48","previous_page":47,"next_page":49}