{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"aad4d586-86fc-4d21-a20d-fd3da08aedc1","title":"导读德勒兹","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787562482765","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"aad4d586-86fc-4d21-a20d-fd3da08aedc1","id":"aad4d586-86fc-4d21-a20d-fd3da08aedc1","uuid":"aad4d586-86fc-4d21-a20d-fd3da08aedc1","title":"导读德勒兹","normalized_title":"导读德勒兹","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787562482765","isbns":["9787562482765"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":241,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/aad4d586-86fc-4d21-a20d-fd3da08aedc1","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%AF%BC%E8%AF%BB%E5%BE%B7%E5%8B%92%E5%85%B9","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/aad4d586-86fc-4d21-a20d-fd3da08aedc1/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/aad4d586-86fc-4d21-a20d-fd3da08aedc1/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/aad4d586-86fc-4d21-a20d-fd3da08aedc1","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/aad4d586-86fc-4d21-a20d-fd3da08aedc1/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/aad4d586-86fc-4d21-a20d-fd3da08aedc1/search"},"page":{"printed_page":184,"pdf_page":202,"physical_index":202,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"44d222d2242bed3b1a7edd16979d86b10e4fb36fabfe62ca6cb3c49b7eb00ece"},"chapter":"导读德勒兹","content":"德勒兹式的批评方兴未艾。或许，开始将德勒兹的方法应用到文学研究上的最好方式，就是考察他自己所做的：他将普鲁斯特看作由符号的问题所驱动的方式(或我们如何超越现实世界去考察世界和他人所能够开启的东西)。在德勒兹的《批评与临床》(Essays:Criticaland Clinical，1997)之中，我们也可以考察德勒兹对劳伦斯，梅尔维尔和其他作家的运用，这些作家使语言变得“结巴”，以便从文学的权力之中产生出新的现实化。总而言之，“德勒兹主义”的挑战不是去重复德勒兹所说的东西，而是去将文学看作对新的言说方式和观看方式的生产。\n\n151\n\n184\n\n导读德勒兹","previous_page":183,"next_page":null}