{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title":"哈贝马斯著作集 包容他者","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153554","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","uuid":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title":"哈贝马斯著作集 包容他者","normalized_title":"哈贝马斯著作集包容他者","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153554","isbns":["9787208153554"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":389,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%93%88%E8%B4%9D%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E8%91%97%E4%BD%9C%E9%9B%86%20%E5%8C%85%E5%AE%B9%E4%BB%96%E8%80%85","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":232,"pdf_page":241,"physical_index":241,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3ffa6e685af4048aed96a7d0755ab82799460b977c491c8d530ca64e5e87ed09"},"chapter":"包容他者","content":"(3）康德所引证的第三个论据，和前面两个也大体相似。康德引证这个论据的目的，是要破除人们怀疑他所提出的国际联盟纯属“狂想的观念”。在共和制政体中，宪法原则是公开检验政治的准则。共和制政府无法“把政治公开建立在聪明的技巧之上”21，即使政治被迫在要嘴皮子。因此，资产阶级公共领域具有一种控制的功能，它可以通过“公开的批评”，阻止与公众原则不能相容的“见不得人”的意图付诸实施。此外，按照康德的观点，公共领域还应该有一种纲领性的功能，比如，允许哲学家充当“公众的法律教师”，允许知识分子“自由和公开地谈论发动战争与缔造和平的原则”，允许公民坚持他们的基本原则。康德在写下下面这段感人之言的时候，想到的是腓特烈二世和伏尔泰：\n\n不能期待着国王哲学化或者是哲学家成为国王，而且也不能这样希望，因为，掌握权力就不可避免地会败坏理性的自由判断。但是，无论国王们，还是（按照平等法律在统治他们自身的）国王般的人民，都不应该使这类哲学家消失或者缄默，而是应该让他们公开讲话：这对于照亮他们双方的事业都是不可或缺的，而且也不会有什么嫌疑。22\n\n232\n\n包容他者","previous_page":231,"next_page":233}